Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

RFE/RL: EU: German Aviation Row Blights Relations With Russia

posted by eagle on November, 2007 as Expressions


From: Eagle_wng  (Original Message) Sent: 11/16/2007 9:15 PM
Friday, November 16, 2007

EU: German Aviation Row Blights Relations With Russia

By Claire Bigg

Germany -- A Lufthansa Airbus A321-100 passenger jet, 18Apr2007.
Lufthansa officials said the overflight dispute has political overtones
(AFP)
November 16, 2007 (RFE/RL) -- Russian and European delegations were scheduled to gather today for a two-day civil aviation summit in Moscow.



Russian authorities, however, were forced to cancel the summit after European delegates boycotted the event amid a bitter dispute on overflight rights.

Lufthansa, the German state-owned airline, has been battling what it says are illegal fees charged by Russia to use an air corridor when flying cargo jets to China and other Asian countries. And Russia has also been pushing for the airline to move its regional cargo hub from Astana, in Kazakhstan, to Siberia.

While Russian officials call the issue purely economic, many in Germany say the dispute has strong political undertones -- another sign of the cooling ties between Russia and the EU.

The dispute culminated on October 28, when Russia briefly barred Lufthansa Cargo from its airspace, claiming a temporary bilateral agreement had elapsed. Authorities nonetheless extended the carrier's overflight rights until the end of February.

But Lufthansa cried foul.

"It's a complicated issue, and it's a political issue," Lufthansa spokesman Michael Goentgens told RFE/RL. "We are just the company that suffers from these conflicts. We're hoping for long-term solutions that are fair to both parties and enable us to fly over Russia since this is the shortest way. It's better both economically and ecologically, because bypassing Russia costs thousands of liters of kerosene every week."

This view was widely echoed in the German press, which denounced Russia's temporary overflight ban as an aggressive attempt to squeeze higher fees out of European carriers. The European Union says its airlines spend a total of 300 million euros ($439 million) a year on Russian overflight rights.

An Economic Conflict

Many see the dispute as the latest in a series of economic battles between Russia and the European Union. Until now, countries on the edge of Europe bore the brunt of these disputes -- whether the battle had been about energy supplies and distribution networks or agriculture. Russia now appears to be taking on the largest economies of the 27-member bloc.

"Now it's key EU member states that are being targeted, like Germany, that always claimed to have a particularly good relationship with Russia," says Joerg Himmelreich, a Berlin-based analyst for the German Marshall Fund of the United States. "And I think this in general demonstrates and proves the change in Russian foreign policy toward the European Union and the change in Russia's foreign policy in general."

But what is perceived in Europe as a political issue is seen in Russia as an isolated economic squabble.

Aviation officials and analysts in Russia largely reject European claims that current overflight arrangements are outdated and that the fees charged by Russia are illegal. The  Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation, signed in 1944 and still active today, stipulate that signatories -- which include Russia -- are not entitled to charge foreign airlines fees other than the cost of local air-control services.

"But these international agreements ensure the principle of parity," explains Aleksei Komarov, an independent Russian aviation expert. "The airlines nominated by the two governments are required to transport the same number of passengers between these two countries, and to conduct the same number of flights to the same number of cities. Considering that Aeroflot and Transaero don't use the totality of their rights, they allow foreign airlines to use Russian air space in exchange for a compensation fee. Whether this is fair or not is debatable."

Moscow also denies having committed itself to entirely scrapping the fees as part of its reforms aimed at gaining membership in the World Trade Organization. Russian aviation officials say they only agreed to restructure the fee system.

Lufthansa In Siberia?

A number of German observers say another motive lurks behind Russia's brief overflight ban -- the prospect of a major Lufthansa cargo hub in Siberia. There has been talk of the German carrier moving its regional cargo transit hub from the Kazakh capital of Astana to Siberia. But here too, the issue is drawing widely divergent accounts from both sides.

"There is no problem, it's already been settled," Timur Khikmatov, the spokesman for Russia's Transport Ministry, told RFE/RL. "On November 14, we received a letter from [German civil aviation chief] Thilo Schmidt, in which he confirmed the readiness to conduct flights to Krasnoyarsk, given that this airport will be upgraded to Category 2. We said 'thank God, finally we received a letter from our German colleagues.'"

According to Khikmatov, Russian and German authorities in February signed an agreement under which Lufthansa Cargo pledged to move its regional hub to either the Krasnoyarsk or the Novosibirsk airport. He insists that Germany failed to give its final answer by the agreed June 25 deadline and ignored four subsequent letters of complaint from the Russian Transport Ministry. This was what prompted Russia to "warn" Germany over overflight rights in October, says Khikmatov, who also denounces a "propaganda campaign" against Russia in German media.

Lufthansa spokesman Goentgens, however, tells a somewhat different story. "There has been no agreement. We talked about this issue, and we know that Russia is interested in us moving this hub to Siberia. We analyzed this and came to the conclusion that moving the hub is currently not possible in the short term. However, we are still open to talks and, in general, there might be a willingness to consider moving our hub to Krasnoyarsk. But a couple of conditions have to be fulfilled."

A central condition is the upgrade of Krasnoyarsk airport's landing system, which currently does not enable aircraft to land in bad weather conditions.

The transport ministries of Germany and Russia are currently in negotiations to hammer out a deal, both on overflight fees and a possible Lufhansa hub in Krasnoyarsk.

Should they succeed in finding common language, both sides have much to gain from these talks. "Russia wants to create a powerful cargo transport center in Siberia," says Vadim Bazykin, a prominent Russian test pilot. "That's why it's buying up Boeing cargo planes, to set up a base there. The funds handed over by airports make up the lion's share of national budgets, it's very profitable."

As for Germany, Lufthansa's Goentgens says Siberia offers a more advantageous hub location than Kazakhstan for European cargo jets en route to the lucrative Asian markets.

(RFE/RL correspondent Jeremy Bransten contributed to this report)

http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/56a2e9f4-bc46-47f3-8d41-260b114c3849.html


 comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Url

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


Postsed:



Search Message Boards



JFNC Message Boards



ARCHIVE


 april 2014

 february 2014

 may 2011

 september 2010

 april 2010

 december 2009

 june 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 march 2005

 january 2005

 november 2000

 october 2000

 september 2000

 august 2000

 july 2000

 june 2000

 may 2000

 april 2000

 march 2000

 february 2000

 january 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®