Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Jamestown Foundation: Putin Promises Economic Overhaul Of North Caucasus

posted by eagle on July, 2010 as Imperialism


Putin Promises Economic Overhaul of North Caucasus

Publication: North Caucasus Analysis 
July 16, 2010 06:09 PM 




On July 6, Russian Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, outlined the government’s plans for North Caucasus development at a United Russia party gathering in the Stavropol region (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru, July 6). However, the grandiose future projects that Putin described in his speech were accompanied by much more modest actual government money infusions pledged by United Russia functionaries.

In his lengthy speech, Russia’s prime minister, who is widely assumed by both his own countrymen and foreigners to be still in charge of the country, praised massive plans to build ski resorts in five out of seven of the North Caucasian republics, including the Republic of Adygea, which is formally not part of the North Caucasian Federal District. According to Putin, the resorts are expected to create as many as 160,000 new jobs in this region of high unemployment, out of 400,000 new jobs that supposedly should be created in the next decade (www.premier.gov.ru, July 6).

At the same time United Russia did not include this project in its top priority list, which means it will not receive government money in the very near future. Instead, United Russia selected seven top priority projects of local importance, one in each of the seven subjects of the North Caucasian Federal District, which it promised to find funding for before the end of 2010 (Kommersant, July 7). The ruling party of Russia reportedly contemplates an additional investment into these and other minor projects to the tune of $200 million-$230 million (www.ng.ru, July 6). The Russian government regards curbing the unemployment rate in the North Caucasus, which exceeds 50 percent in some of its regions, as one of the main tools to stabilize the volatile territory.

Putin recalled that for the past ten years Moscow had invested and sent nearly $27 billion to the North Caucasus. The amount of financial assistance dramatically increased during this period –from $500 million per year in 2000 to $6 billion currently. He also noted special cases like Ingushetia, which is receiving a unique assistance package from Moscow worth $1 billion. The credibility of the prospects Putin described in his speech was somewhat undermined when he went on to set an unrealistically high economic growth benchmark for the North Caucasus –10 percent annually (www.premier.gov.ru, July 6). Even at the height of oil and gas prices in 2007, Russia as a whole did not achieve 10 percent. The World Bank forecast for Russian economic growth was downgraded in June to 4.5 percent in 2010 and 4.8 percent in 2011 (www.gazeta.ru, June 16). The North Caucasus, with its multiple problems, can hardly expect to see 10 percent economic growth any time soon, especially as Putin acknowledged that corruption is a significant factor both at the regional and federal level and offered no detailed remedies for it.

Putin’s presentation was designed to be the culmination of the big gathering of the United Russia party that started in Kabardino-Balkaria on July 5 and then moved on to the Stavropol region the next day. The event itself and Putin’s speech may have been aimed not so much at delivering groundbreaking reforms as at boosting local functionaries’ morale and solidifying the support of the local elites in anticipation of Russian parliamentary elections in 2011 and presidential elections in 2012. Moscow’s envoy to the North Caucasus, Aleksandr Khloponin, himself being a member of the ruling body of the United Russia party, kept a low profile during the event and was remarkably absent from media reports about the gathering.

The most basic issues of safety are still unresolved in most parts of the North Caucasus, even though the Russian prime minister tried to play down their importance. Meanwhile, in Dagestan alone 152 people have died in attacks since the start of 2010. Among those killed were reportedly 27 civilians, 58 insurgents and 67 law enforcement agents, and an additional 176 people were wounded (www.ndelo.ru, July 9). On July 10, a federal judge, Magomed Khasbulatov, was killed in Dagestan’s Untsukul district, one of the most radical districts in the republic. Another judge had been killed in the same district a month earlier (Ekho Moskvy, July 10). The leaders of United Russia reportedly declined to answer a question about how the safety of businessmen and tourists would be ensured if the party’s plans for the North Caucasus were successfully implemented (www.ng.ru, July 6).

Khloponin held a follow up press conference on July 8, in which he reiterated his focus on solving the unemployment issue in the district, which has 827,000 people unemployed or 18 percent of the working age population. Khloponin announced that the government will prioritize projects in tourism, the construction industry and agricultural sectors (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru, July 8). On the one hand, the real number of the unemployed may be higher, as many people in the region do not register as unemployed, not seeing the benefits of it. On the other hand, the percentage of the population that is unemployed may also be significantly higher than stated because in some republics, namely Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan and Kabardino-Balkaria, the local authorities, with Moscow’s tacit consent, managed to beef up their respective general populations in the 2002 census. It is improbable, for instance, that Chechnya, following two devastating wars and a mass exodus of its population, can still have a population of nearly 1.3 million, substantially more than in the prewar republic.

There have been some promising public declarations of changes in Moscow’s policy toward the North Caucasus and a shift from suppressing dissident groups to economic development there. However, the advertised numbers do not appear to add up and therefore create an impression of a political public relations campaign that is either tailored to meet political ends or betrays Moscow’s real inability to change the situation in the volatile North Caucasus.

http://www.jamestown.org/programs/ncw/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=36636&tx_ttnews[backPid]=24&cHash=45332f5d41


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Imperialism



Imperialism



Archive


 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000





Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®