Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation



Window On Eurasia: Moscow’s New Man In The North Caucasus Seen Ready To Change Borders There

posted by eagle on January, 2010 as Imperialism


Window on Eurasia: Moscow’s New Man in the North Caucasus Seen Ready to Change Borders There

Paul Goble

Vienna, January 26 – Aleksandr Khloponin, Moscow’s newly appointed head of the North Caucasus Federal District, has experience with amalgamating regions in the past and thus may be inclined to combine or otherwise change the borders among the republics of that region, according to a leading Russian analyst.
In an article posted online today, Eduard Popov, the head of the Black Sea-Caspian Center of the Russian Institute of Strategic Studies in Rostov-na-Donu, notes that Khloponin, in his capacity of Krasnoyarsk governor, organized the unification of the Taymyr (Dolgano-Nenets) and Evenk autonomous districts with that kray (
And consequently, that 2005 experience, along with the new talk about amalgamation following the recent declarations of Duma Speaker Boris Gryzlov, suggests, Popov continues, that Moscow may be ready to change borders in the Caucasus despite what everyone concedes is the extraordinary sensitivities of the people in that region to such steps.
The possibility that the central Russian government may in fact take on that challenge is suggested by the reactions of a range of Duma deputies to Gryzlov’s proposal, reactions that were reported yesterday in a article perhaps significantly entitled “Size Matters” (
Most of those the news agency contacted said they favored uniting weaker units with stronger ones but believed that Moscow must move cautiously because in the words of one deputy “sovereignty is always a plus,” even if those involved are not in a position to pay their own way.
Others, including Untied Russia’s Vladimir Pekhtin, said that the amalgamation of federal subjects was “an absolutely wise measure” as long as the center develops for each subject involved “an individual plan of social-economic and infrastructure development, the consistent realization of which gives a positive effect.”
In his listing of Moscow’s successes in this area, he pointed to the folding in of the two non-Russian districts into Krasnoyarsk kray that the new presidential plenipotentiary in the North Caucasus oversaw, although Pekhtin added that amalgamation might be “especially” relevant for the Far North, perhaps an indication of concerns about doing in the Caucasus.
Given that Gryzlov suggested recipient regions should be amalgamated with donor ones, it is not entirely easy to see where Khloponin would begin as all the republics of the North Caucasus receive significant subsidies and none appears likely to become a donor subject any time soon.
Nonetheless, the suggestion that Moscow might be thinking about amalgamation in the Caucasus and Khloponin’s own technocratic – that is economic rather than ethnically sensitive approach – is by itself likely to raise concerns across the North Caucasus, the very region that even Vladimir Putin earlier suggested would be the last candidate for such combinations.
Meanwhile, an article posted online yesterday highlights border problems elsewhere in the former Soviet space: All Central Asian countries have potentially explosive border disputes with each other -- except for Turkmenistan, which has one with Baku about the Caspian seabed (
In that article, Aleksandr Shustov notes that these disputes are not only between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, as many know because of the comments of the Tajik president last year, but also between Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan and between Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation and among the region over several non-contiguous ethnic exclaves.
These disputes are yet another legacy of the Soviet period when Moscow not only delimited the territories of these republics in the 1920s in ways that left significant communities of various national groups on the “wrong” side of the border but also repeatedly shifted the borders among these republics during the course of the next six decades.
These “slow-acting mines” have been made even dangerous by local government decisions – there is only one road linking the predominantly Kyrgyz north of that country with the increasingly Uzbek south – and by differential growth rates of the various nationalities, with the Uzbeks having a far higher birthrate than most of the others. 
So far, these disputes have simmered, with only occasional military action by border guards in the case of Uzbekistan or the decision to create a naval flotilla by Turkmenistan, but, as Shustov suggests, “any sharpening of ethno-territorial conflicts [in this region] is extremely dangerous.”
“The destabilization of the situation in any of the three most conflict-ridden states of Central Asia – Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan – are capable of generating a chain reaction throughout the entire region,” Shustov says, one that would inevitably drawn in Russia and possibly other outside powers.

comments (0)

1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*


Verification code*


New Posts

Search Imperialism



 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000

Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at:

Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®