Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Prague Watchdog: Where Does Russia End?

posted by eagle on October, 2009 as Imperialism


October 23rd 2009 · Prague Watchdog / Demis Polandov ·  ALSO AVAILABLE IN: RUSSIAN 

Where does Russia end?

By Demis Polandov, special to Prague Watchdog

Chechnya is the leading candidate for secession from the Russian empire. With its mono-ethnic population, today’s Chechnya makes one think of an overseas colony. The region has a clearly-established ethnic border. All the institutions of statehood have been created. They do not function as they ought to, in many of their manifestations they are inhumane, but they exist. The people, including the president, are replaceable. The rotation of officials is painless and organic. Of course, similar institutions also existed in the ChASSR (Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic), but during the deportations of the Chechens and Ingush they were almost completely destroyed. The deportations led to an enormous collapse in the level of educational attainment, and the development of the intelligentsia and the bureaucracy was stunted for an entire generation. The total nature of the deportations left no chance of rescuing the elites that had come into being the Soviet era, and the pressure on the "guilty population" lasted almost until the end of Soviet rule.

Two terrible wars and a drop in the level of education have not struck a similarly total blow at the "elite" potential of the Chechen people. In the post-Soviet period, Moscow's best universities have accepted and trained a large number of Chechens who are now experts in the fields of jurisprudence and economics. Clearly at present it cannot be said that the region enjoys economic self-sufficiency. This point would seem to support the arguments of those who support an anti-separatist view of the current position. However, the federal centre is currently making huge investments in the republic, and these are certainly strengthening the degree to which Chechnya can sustain itself. Also, these subsidies are in themselves a divisive factor – Russia does not want to go on paying the bills forever. Moreover, if a free and fair referendum were held in Chechnya today, it is likely that more than 80% of the population would vote for independence.

In the pages of Prague Watchdog Mikhail Pozharsky recently expressed the view of some Russian nationalists on the question of whether the separation of the North Caucasus from Russia is desirable or feasible. It is ironic that Russian liberals often come to a similar conclusion, though guided by quite different ideological attitudes. Though it is reasonable to wonder what point there is in discussing the approaches of liberals and nationalists if neither are in power, there is a point in raising such a question. The fact is that there are only two officially-sanctioned projects for the modernization of Russia, and both are potentially fatal to the empire.

Almost no economic proposals are heard from the liberal camp. The economic reforms of the 1990s and 2000s were essentially liberal, and so no really significant changes in Russia’s legislative base are needed. The only problem is that the laws that were written on paper have not been able to modernize Russia's economy. The liberals see the reason for this in the failure to implement the new legislation, less in the field of the economy than in that of human rights. They place the emphasis on the operation of a free market, minimal government intervention in the economy and the lives of citizens, the development of public institutions, and the rule of law.

Russia’s patriotic nationalists think of their country as a unitary state of the Russian people, and appeal to the ethnic Russians who make up 80% of the population. They believe that the abolition of the country’s ethnic division into regions, the dismantling of the federal structure and the suppression of national minority movements will be able to solve most of the problems and give Russia the prospect of a long-term future. However, many nationalists also realize that there are some regions it will be impossible to suppress completely and "integrate" within the Russian state, and they will therefore be offered separation or secession.

There is supposedly yet another project – something called "sovereign modernization". Despite the topic’s popularity and apparently obvious nature, it has never acquired anything close to a coherent conceptual framework. I have not been able to discover anything in it beyond an assertion of the need for modernization. It would appear that the Russian government and the experts who serve it are trying to invent some sort of special mechanisms borrowed from both West and East (China) which will carry out a modernization of the economy without modernizing society. The attempt is as old as the hills – a protective ideology, another symptom of the last stages of empire.

Trying to keep everything as it is constitutes the worst possible project, because it is not a project at all – rather, it reflects an unwillingness to change the badly crumbling foundations of society. All efforts to preserve an empire without real modernization merely speed up its centrifugal tendencies. Tactical decisions taken without any strategic vision of the future cannot lead to a different result. Liberal tax reform and bureaucratic misconduct, the abolition of elected regional heads and the actual existence of private fiefdoms under irremovable governors, the combating of corruption and the growth of corruption – the list of examples of unadorned facts and attempts to correct them is a long one. Incidentally, President Kadyrov and the two wars in Chechnya are also classic examples of such protective policy. 

Nearly all the conditions for the Chechens to secede from Russia are now in place. A clearly-defined mono-ethnic territory with experience in building state institutions, an emerging elite, a shared ideology of secession from Russia – even though within Chechnya there are several ideologies (and I do not claim that everything will be calm and peaceful after the secession) – all these signs are adding to the empire’s general state of crisis and making the liberation of Chechnya the most probable scenario. It is unlikely to happen in the next few years. The Chechens will have to wait either for Russia’s modernization or for the profound crisis that will loom within it in fifteen or twenty years’ time. However, another war with the empire cannot be ruled out. Controlling potential revolutionary forces by means of small, periodic wars is an old method used by "protectors". Though one imagines that Russia is unlikely to take such a step in Chechnya.

Demis Polandov is an economics journalist and former deputy editor-in-chief of "Gazeta"
 

Photo: naviny.by.


(Translation by DM)


http://www.watchdog.cz/?show=000000-000024-000004-000012〈=1


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Imperialism



Imperialism



Archive


 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000





Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®