Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation



Window On Eurasia: Medvedev Seeks ‘Real Not Cosmetic’ Stability In North Caucasus

posted by eagle on August, 2009 as Imperialism


Window on Eurasia: Medvedev Seeks ‘Real Not Cosmetic’ Stability in North Caucasus

Paul Goble

Vienna, August 20 –President Dmitry Medvedev said that Russia must pursue “real not cosmetic” stability in the North Caucasus, an indication of just how much the security situation has deteriorated and how disappointed the Kremlin now is in the claims by his predecessor Vladimir Putin that the situation there has been improving. 
But Medvedev’s five point program, which he presented to the leaders of Russia’s security services yesterday, does not appear to promise any greater success, let alone to justify his Putinesque statement that “one must not stand on ceremony with the terrorists. They must be liquidated without hesitation” (
What Medvedev’s proposals do appear to presage, however, is a further expansion of Russian military actions there, a greater willingness to dismiss local officials possibly with the installation of ethnic Russians in their place, and as a result, at least in the short and medium term, an increase in the already high level of violence in the North Caucasus.
Medvedev’s program includes, first, a call for better interagency coordination among the siloviki, second, a “radical reconstruction of work with cadres,” third, better protection for law enforcement personnel, fourth, changes in the law to ensure terrorists are punished, and fifth, a meeting on the North Caucasus about how to improve economic conditions there.
Even as Medvedev was delivering this message, other officials and commentators were calling attention to why measures like these, however important they may be individually or collectively, are unlikely to reverse the current trends in most parts of the North Caucasus and could even make the situation worse. 
In an interview published in yesterday’s “Rossiiskaya gazeta,” Aleksandr Torshin, the first deputy head of the Federation Council, argued that the introduction of counter-terrorism operations is “not a panacea,” is extremely expensive, and may prove counterproductive relative to Moscow’s goals (
In a second commentary, featured in the current issue of “Russky reporter,” Mikhail Solodovnikov argues that Moscow does not yet appear to understand that in many cases, “the bandit underground will exist as long as local political elites directly or indirectly continue to finance it” in pursuit of their own political aims (
According to Daghestani militia commanders, he said, “bandits” there finance their activities by carrying out murders or other acts of intimidation at the request of local officials who seek to “liquidate, frighten or discredit” their opponents or extract resources from the center by suggesting that they themselves are threatened by this “underground.”
According to interior ministry sources in Makhachkala, the “bandits” are paid 100,000 to 200,000 rubles (3,000 to 6,000 US dollars) for the average attack, but if more senior officials are to be the targets, they get even more – 500,000 rubles (15,000 US dollars) for a district chief, and perhaps 1.5 to 2 million US dollars for the killing of MVD chief Adilgerei Magomedtagirov.
In part as a result of this domestic financing, since the counter-terrorism operation was lifted in Chechnya on April 16, Solodovnikov continued, the number of serious attacks has increased in many parts of the North Caucasus and shows no sign of coming down anytime in the immediate future.
And in a third essay, Ruslan Kurbanov, an expert on region, argues that what Moscow faces now is “the Talibanization of the Caucasus,” the rise of the kind of religiously motivated and well-funded (from drugs, foreign allies, and local officials) operation that the US is finding it so hard to defeat in Afghanistan (
In a detailed and closely argued 2900-word article, Kurbanov describes why and how this movement has arisen in the North Caucasus, the role Moscow’s past policies have played in that, and the likelihood that regardless of what the Russian government does now or in the future, it will face a serious challenge from that region for a long time to come.
Given this increasing pessimism, it is perhaps not surprising that some Russian analysts have suggested that Moscow may soon have to make a choice not between stability and instability, as Medvedev appears to believe, but rather among three other options, none of which is entirely acceptable to the Russian government or the Russian people. 
Boris Sokolov says that the deteriorating situation means that Moscow may have to choose between a massive campaign to destroy the Islamic underground, the acceptance of a set of independent countries relatively friendly to Russia, or the rise of a North Caucasian Islamic state hostile to Moscow (
And the Russian government, however many steps Medvedev takes, may not have as much time to achieve its goals as he would like. Not only is the security situation in the North Caucasus deteriorating, but ethno-religious violence from that region is now spilling over into predominantly Russian regions like Stavropol (

comments (0)

1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*


Verification code*


New Posts

Search Imperialism



 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000

Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at:

Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®