Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation



Window On Eurasia: Another Obstacle To Putin’s Plan To Amalgamate Russia’s Regions

posted by eagle on July, 2009 as Imperialism

MONDAY, JULY 6, 2009

Window on Eurasia: Another Obstacle to Putin’s Plan to Amalgamate Russia’s Regions

Paul Goble

Vienna, July 6 – Vladimir Putin had little difficulty pushing through the amalgamation of two Buryat federal subjects into the predominantly ethnic Russians surrounding them, but now a new problem has arisen: the residents of one whose status has been reduced to that of an ordinary district want the same special privileges the residents of the other that has received them.
And this demonstration effect suggests that both Moscow and regional governments are going to be challenged to come up with a more acceptable definition of “an administrative-territorial unit with special status” that they have promised the six national districts that have been folded in to five now “united” federal subjects.
Last week, deputies from the Ust-Orda Buryat District which since January 2008 is part of Irkutsk oblast complained that they had not been given the rights and powers that officials and residents of the Aga-Buryat district have now that the latter is part of the Trans-Baikal kray, the successor to Chita oblast (
This argument took place in the context of developments in neighboring Krasnoyarsk kray, which, when it absorbed the Evenk and Taymyr autonomous districts in January 2007, treated these two areas as administrative subdivisions of the kray with no special rights because of their ethno-national history and population.
At a roundtable last Wednesday, scholars and administrators squared off on this question. Svetlana Praskova, a specialist at the Irkutsk Institute of Legislation and Legal Information, pointed out that there is no specific legal definition as to what constitutes a “special status” for ethnic regions. Perhaps, she added, “Irkutsk oblast will become a pioneer in this.” 
But if so, it will have to overcome the proclivity of officials as in Krasnoyarsk to “repeat the Soviet system of organization, when all settlements were divided into rural soviets and at a higher level, districts, without any special administration combining these regions,” even though “former autonomies have received a number of rights which other regions do not.”
Praskova pointed out that in Perm, where the Komi-Permyak district was folded in, these rights were “extremely limited” and involved only “the development of ethnic types of sport and culture,” despite promises that their “national uniqueness” will be protected. “Practice shows that very little attention is being paid to this,” however, perhaps, she said, as a result of “the crisis.”
The situation in TransBaikal kray, as the Chita oblast is now known, is “different.” There, the Aga-Buryat district has “the right to coordinate profile territorial subdivisions of kray ministries,” an arrangement that means they are under “dual subordination,” to the minister and to the district administrator.
Krasnoyarsk kray currently does not make any distinctions for the Evenk and Taymyr districts or even suggest that any will be made, but in Irkutsk, while little has been done yet, the Ust-Orda regional charter specifically allows for the adoption of a special law that would govern relations between that region and the oblast authorities.
In principle, then, Praskova says, there is no reason why Irkutsk could not adopt arrangements like those in the Trans-Baikal. But some officials are very much opposed. Eduard Devitsky, the deputy chief of the legal department of the Irkutsk governor’s office, said that any “special status” should not make the district equivalent to what it was “before unification.”
According to Devitsky, “everything necessary has already been written down in the Statute: the preservation of national uniqueness, the harmonization of social-economic development, and media in the Buryat language.” Giving the Buryats more powers, he continued, would “contradict” federal law.
But legal experts argued last week that Devitsky’s position is disingenuous. Bato Damdinov, a specialist on constitutional law at Irkutsk State University, said that “in fact, the Federation laid on the subjects the power to establish a ‘special status’” for these ethnic regions. Indeed, he suggested, “special status” is “a euphemism” for autonomy.
And to the extent that is the case, he continued, federation subjects can follow the approach adopted for the Aga district, “without giving way to ‘political-legal mimicry’ as is the case in Krasnoyarsk kray,” where, Damdinov said, “the autonomies have lost their status without acquiring anything in exchange.”
Other speakers seconded that view. Klementy Khabituyev, a representative of Ust-Orda, said that his region had seen its rights cut since unification and argued that there ought to be at least one deputy governor position reserved for the Buryats in order to secure the rights of that people in the federal subject.
Another Ust-Orda official, Anatoly Prokopyev, called for making his district a “special economic zone” in order to protect its specific features, a proposal others at the meeting supported as well. And a chorus complained that the oblast had failed to live up to its promises: only two of the 15 projects promised during the referendum have been completed.
Ignoring the rights of minorities especially after making such promises is “dangerous and harmful,” participants said, and they suggested that Krasnoyarsk and Irkutsk should follow the TransBaikal approach were, in the words of one, “our brothers have advanced far ahead.” If Irkutsk follows Krasnoyarsk, all Buryats, he said, will ask why Buryats there agreed to that.
Many in Moscow counted each vote to amalgamate federal subjects as some kind of final victory, but the discussions last week suggest that such conclusions are at best premature and that the experiences of non-Russian groups in one part of the country are ever more likely to inform the attitudes of those in another, something that points to more trouble ahead for Putin’s plan.

comments (0)

1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*


Verification code*


New Posts

Search Imperialism



 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000

Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at:

Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®