Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

RFE/RL: National Republics Resist Moscow's Demand To Amend Constitutions

posted by eagle on June, 2009 as Imperialism


June 23, 2009

National Republics Resist Moscow's Demand To Amend Constitutions


by Paul Goble

Three of the four national republics the Russian Constitutional Court earlier this month ordered to drop references in their constitutions to republic sovereignty and citizenship are dragging their feet. That reluctance reflects both the importance of these terms to many non-Russians, and the calculation that resistance to the center could yield dividends.

While the Sakha (former Yakutia) parliament approved on June 17 a law making the changes Moscow wants, the governments of Tuva, Tatarstan, and Bashkortostan have not taken this step and, in at least the cases of Kazan and Ufa, do not appear to be planning to do so in the immediate future. 

Last week in Tuva, deputies in the Grand Khural, as the republic's parliament is known, voted down legislation that would have created a constitutional commission to consider the changes. But Tuvan officials implied that the deputies were acting "out of inertia" and would soon comply with the Constitutional Court order. 

The situation in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan appears to be very different. There, in the words of a lead article in "Nezavisimaya gazeta," the Constitutional Court demand is viewed as the latest effort by Moscow to undermine the legitimate powers of the republics. While Bashkortostan's President Murtaza Rakhimov said immediately after the court announced its decision that "once the leadership has given an order, we will change" what has to be changed, his own outspoken criticism of Moscow's policies and United Russia’s arrangements has been accompanied by no moves to do so. 

Indeed, since then, one of Rakhimov's senior aides, Sergei Lavrentyev has issued an even more withering criticism of federal policies in spite of, or perhaps because of rumors, now much reduced in the wake of chief Kremlin ideologist Vladislav Surkov's June 19 visit to Ufa, that Moscow was about to fire Rakhimov. 

Thinking Long-Term

However that may be, "Nezavisimaya gazeta" points out that "eight years ago" Rakhimov and Tatarstan's President Mintimer Shaimiyev were able "to find a compromise with the country's leadership" despite then-Russian President Vladimir Putin's efforts to perfect his "power vertical." 

The two Middle Volga leaders agreed to bring "local laws into line with federal ones," but only if Moscow "left untouched" the declarations in the constitutions of those two large Turkic republics concerning their own sovereignty and national citizenship. The two did so apparently in the hope that after Putin left office, they could revisit this arrangement to their benefit.

But instead, Moscow has sought to pressure the two republics further in violation of the compromise they thought would remain a baseline in their relationships with the center. And consequently, the independent Moscow paper suggested, the two are now playing a different game, seeking other "political dividends" in return for ultimately agreeing to go along.

Earlier last week, Tatarstan asked Moscow for more than 15 billion rubles ($480 million) to cover the local budget deficit, a request that Shaimiyev accompanied with a statement that Moscow officials apparently do not know the Russian Constitution very well since there is a reference in that document to "sovereign republics within Russia."

Were Shaimiyev and Rakhimov to give way on this, the paper continued, that would represent "the bankruptcy of the political line" that Shaimiyev has pursued "for 20 years." Consequently, at the very least, he and Rakhimov are going to drag out the process, hopeful that Moscow will decide it is cheaper to pay them off in other ways.

Whether that calculation will work this time around is uncertain, but Surkov's statements after meeting Rakhimov suggest that Moscow doesn't want to provoke a fight over this, at least not during the current crisis. And consequently, the "better times" Shaimiyev and Rakhimov have been waiting for may be closer, but very different than, anyone else expected.

Meanwhile, the other federal subjects the court directed to make similar changes -- the republics of Kabardino-Balkaria, Komi, Chechnya, and Buryatia, and the autonomous districts of Nenets and Yamalo-Nenets -- are supposedly slated to go ahead, although it is entirely possible that leaders in some of them may take their lead from Tatarstan and Bashkortostan. 

On June 18, Chechen Constitutional Court Chairman Sultan Abdulkhanov said a special commission will be created to draft unspecified "minor changes" that are required to bring the Chechen Republic's constitution into line with that of the Russian Federation.


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Imperialism



Imperialism



Archive


 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000





Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®