Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation



Window On Eurasia: Russian Citizens Try To Bridge The Gap between Ethnic And Civic Identities

posted by eagle on April, 2009 as Imperialism


Window on Eurasia: Russian Citizens Try to Bridge the Gap between Ethnic and Civic Identities

Paul Goble

Vienna, April 7 – One of the deepest social and political divides in the Russian Federation is between those who identify themselves as ethnic Russians and believe that country should become a Russia for the Russians and those who define themselves as civic Russians either because they are not ethnically Russian or because they embrace a broader civic vision.
Last Friday in Moscow’s President Hotel, leaders of these two trends met to discuss whether they could “cross the line which divides” them – “extreme nationalism and hatred of ‘aliens,’” on the one hand, and “the withering away of the national identity of Russian [‘russkiye’] citizens” (
The session has unusual sponsors for an event like this – the Russian Social Movement and the Federal National Cultural Autonomy of the Azerbaijanis of Russia – and it both attracted a remarkable mix of people on both sides of this “line” and sparked a lively debate between the ethnic Russians (“russkiye’) and the civic Russians (”rossiyane”).
The ethnic Russian side was represented by journalist I.A. Boikov, V.L. Kraynin of the Movement Against Illegal Immigration (DPNI), K.A. Krylov of the Russian Social Movement, V.S. Parkhomenko, a spokesman for the Terek Cossacks, journalist A.V. Samovarov, editor Sergey Sergeyev, and N.L. Khomogorov of the Anti-Russophobe League.
The civic or non-ethnic Russian side was represented by the leaders of various national cultural autonomies, national movements operating inside the Russian Federation, Duma deputies, urban and regional officials, and Social Chamber members, as well as officers of various political parties, religious groups, and social organizations. 
At the end of the session, the participants drafted a set of eight recommendations which they suggested should be the basis for further discussion and refinement, and because of the potential political importance of any accord between those most commentators have suggested are increasingly at daggers drawn, a summary of them is given below.
First, the two sides supported the creation and registration of a social organization that would continue to discuss relations between ethnic Russians and others. Second, they pledged to seek the elimination of any restrictions on any restrictions, legal or otherwise, to “the objective treatment in the media and the free discussion of problems” involving ethnic relations.
Third, national problems, including those of the Russian people, need regular and public discussion at the highest levels of the state with those the various groups select rather than people appointed by the regime. Fourth, all restrictions on ethnic Russian groups need to be removed so that they are not driven into “’the shadow sector of politics,’ including an armed underground.”
Fifth, the sides continued in their joint recommendations, existing Russian legislation laws must be changed so that people may form political parties on an ethnic basis and so that ethnic Russians can form their own national cultural autonomies in areas where they are a minority. 
Sixth, they said that “it is necessary to struggle with manifestations of localism and regional groups in the army, universities, and the administrative system in Russia, particularly in its national-territorial subjects. Seventh, they calls for new laws to regulate migration and to prevent illegal immigration “which is having an extremely negative impact” on the country.
And eighth, they agreed that it is important to maintain and strengthen the Russian “cultural-linguistic space which had unified all peoples of the former Soviet Union” and that the government must take the lead in doing so not only within the Russian Federation, which itself is multi-national, but in the other post-Soviet states as well.
“The collapse of [the USSR],” they concluded, “had given one important plus: we all recognize the value of one another and understand that in this world we as flourishing states aren’t needed by either the West or the East,” a view the statement regretted was “not yet shared by all citizens of the Russian Federation.”
“We are,” the participants declared, “ready to make friends with and cooperate with all peoples who sincerely want peace and development. As Talleyrand said, good diplomacy does not produce enemies. Our struggle is not conducted ‘against’ (anyone’s rights and interests0 but only ‘for’ – for our own rights and interests.”
Meetings of this type in the Russian Federation are rare, and no one of them reflects all the views of both sides of this divide. Indeed, it is important to remember that the views expressed in this document more fully reflect the views of Russian nationalists and non-Russian diasporas than they do those of civic nationalists more generally.
But at the same time, this effort to reach across what has often been a gulf suggests that there are people on both sides who are now as they have not always been in the past prepared to discuss what might be done to build alliances, a trend that could provide an important support for civic peace at a time of increasing tensions.

comments (0)

1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*


Verification code*


New Posts

Search Imperialism



 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000

Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at:

Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®