Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Window on Russia: Is Putin in Fact Planning to Divide Russia into 50 States?

posted by zaina19 on December, 2008 as Imperialism


From: MSN NicknameEagle_wng  (Original Message)    Sent: 12/14/2007 2:49 AM
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Window on Russia: Is Putin in Fact Planning to Divide Russia into 50 States?

Paul Goble

Vienna, December 13 – President Vladimir Putin’s comment at the end of last month that Moscow may modify the borders of some of the seven federal districts he created either reflects or has sparked speculation that the Kremlin plans to re-divide the administration structures of the Russian Federation in more radical ways.
This week, the RBK news agency reported that the Russian government in fact has drawn up plans to transform the seven federal districts into seven “meta-regions” with slightly different borders than the existing ones have and to reduce the number of federal subjects to “no more than 50” (http://www.apn.ru/news/article18680.htm).
According to that agency, the Kremlin plans to begin by combining Moscow and Moscow oblast, a move Mayor Yuri Luzhkov has long sought, to unite St. Petersburg and Leningrad oblast, something the city authorities there desire, and to recombine Chechnya and Ingushetia, which Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov has urged.
But if each of these steps has its supporters, all have serious opponents. Neither Moscow nor Leningrad oblast leaders want to cede their power to a combined entity, and Ingush officials, even those who are the most pro-Moscow, have been openly skeptical about the desirability of recombining the two republics that split apart 15 years ago.
In the past, such opposition of regional leaders in places like Adygeia and the Altai has been sufficient to slow if not completely stop whatever plans Moscow may have, but now there is another factor that APN analysts suggest may put a hold on this idea at least over the electoral season.
However much the leaders of the newly combined units might feel they owe the Kremlin and its leader, they would control far more assets and thus be in a better position to contest what the federal center might want. Indeed, the APN analysts say, such a combination could lead to significant conflicts between Moscow and the regions.
Why then did this report appear and appear now? There are at least three possible explanations, none of which can be immediately excluded. First, the RBK news item may simply be a complete fabrication, imputing to a comment Putin made on November 30 about the boundaries of the federal districts far more than is in fact there.
Second, this report may constitute a testing of the waters, an effort by the central authorities to see just how regional and other leaders might react to such a move. If so, then the lack of reaction to it over the last few days indicates that most of them are pursuing a cautious wait and see approach.
Or third, it could be completely accurate. In that event, Putin may be planning a kind of “big bang” approach to administrative reform, one that would allow him to introduce a number of very radical changes quickly at the end of his presidency and thus position him to form new alliances with new leaders.
If the last possibility is correct, then this move may be part of a far larger game intended to increase Putin’s freedom of action not only with respect to the regions but also in Moscow itself. Obviously, some of the regional leaders who would be losers at home could find themselves elevated to Moscow as newly minted Putin allies.
But there is one detail about this report that suggests the journalists who prepared it may be guessing or alternatively that the officials who put this idea into their heads were making something up out of more or less whole cloth: the number 50. Ever since at least 1825, Russians have been fascinated by the number of American states.
The chief ideologue of the Decembrists, Pavel Pestel, wrote that he and his fellow conspirators hoped to divide the new Russia into 13 states, just like the United States at the beginning of its history at the end of the eighteenth century and a number that he thought would promote a free and democratic Russia.
And in December 1991 -- indeed on the very day that the presidents of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus were meeting to eliminate his position and the country over which he ruled -- Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev told journalists that he hoped to divide the USSR into 50 states, just like the United States now.
By making reference to this number, RBK joins a long tradition of superficial copying of American arrangements by Russian leaders, but given Putin’s current political course, it seems extremely unlikely that he in fact would be prepared to settle on exactly the same number.
And thus it may very well be that the radicalism of this proposal, if indeed it is real, is intended to allow him to take several smaller moves, thereby winning more friends among Russian nationalist groups without creating the kind of threat to the central authorities that a smaller number of larger federal units might pose.

Posted by Paul Goble at 9:25 PM

http://windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2007/12/window-on-russia-is-putin-in-fact.html


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Imperialism



Imperialism



Archive


 january 2015

 march 2014

 november 2013

 september 2013

 july 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 september 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 september 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 march 2008

 february 2008

 january 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 january 2005

 july 2000





Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®