October, 25, 2005
Old "zampolits" in a role of new analysts
On usual on new radio "Svoboda" new tradition to discuss the situation on Caucasus the colonel of a stock Alexander Sharavin - the director of Institute of the political and military analysis was invited. As a rule, Russian military-political analytics which are a lot in Russia, like generals, are basically trained for a new profession after disorder of the USSR "zampolits". They have not understood what differs the analysis from propagation.
Institute of Sharavin has become famous for the "sagacity" about which, in connection with events in Nalchik, its director has told: "I have to recognize, that as experts, in institute we have quite good professionals, because two - three ago years we spoke, that the situation is heated over all Northern Caucasus, there may be difficult conditions, armed undergroung is prepared." However, to make such prediction to Sharavin and to his regular oracles it was not more difficult than to predict approach of spring after winter. And if there were doubts, they might verify the forecasts with orders of the Chechen military-political management concerning opening the Caucasian and Dagestan fronts in structure of MR of CHRI. We may even help Sharavin to astonish radio "Svoboda" by his insight, having hinted, that on turn are opening of Moscow and Privolzhsk fronts of MR of CHRI. He may predict these events for 2006.
In general, circumstance, that every possible "Institute of strategic researches" - is only the propaganda appendix of authorities -is not a secret for a long time. This has confirmed sharavin, having repeated usual spells that it is necessary for correction of a situation to strengthen the struggle with terrorism, to raise professionalism of special services and, even almost cried over selflessness of representatives of power departments, "whos heroism saves the situation". In general, you will not spend on drink the professionalism, the analyst feels the general and does not turn off from it .
However special interest in Sharavins statement has caused his passage about legal aspects of conducting operations. Not clear, whether these were his own seditious ideas, or he was forced to do the revelations, by the annoying radio listener who has reminded of crimes of federals, in particular about Budanov. The sense of a question was that the list of crimes on the occasion of terrorism, that are taken on arms by Russia and are actively applied by her army and special services, and mojaheds, by the same classification, may not be considered as terrorists in any way, and should refer to as as insurgents.
Here Sharavin exploaded: "There are the international laws, when it is possible to recognize insurgents as insurgents. In particular, in Nazran they already operated not as insurgents. For example, they can't act against workers of Offices of Public Prosecutor and court as against usual power structures. It is possible to battle, we admit, with militia, it is possible to battle with soldiers and it will not be against the international laws, that is, then they might be qualified as guerrillas. But when they killed workers of Office of Public Prosecutor when they killed workers of court, in Nazran, they have already crossed the law. The same can be told about Nalchik, probably. We do not know details of everything, but we know, that peaceful people there killed. If they died from hands of terrorists, means they too were against the law".
It appears, when mojaheds have crossed the line and have turned from "guerillas" in "terrorists" - when they began to kill judges and public prosecutors. And if courts and special services represent the uniform criminal organization, the uniform mechanism in fulfilment of a genocide? The facts when the judge, without a blink of eye pass sentence to people delivered in a hall of court on a stretcher, not capable to move after tortures during which they are forced to sign false testimony are known. How to be with the public prosecutor who after murder by power structures in innocent person in his own house, backdating writes out to murderers in shoulder strap the warrant on a search in the house of killed, and then all this bloody swindle is brought as "resistance to workers of the bodies which have arrived for search"? Interestingly, by "international laws" about which speaks Sharavin, the persons making similar crimes, may refer to as judges and public prosecutors?
Questions, certainly, are not in calculation on the answer from crafty liars like Sharavin. As against the uncomplaining population of Russia, by mojaheds already is actively applied the mechanism of attraction to the responsibility of such judges and public prosecutors, irrespective of opinion of the present criminals in authority .
In continuation and expansion of war on Caucasus not last role is played by similar institutes, one of which represents Sharavin. They are excited not with disclosing of the reasons of an event, and the justification of crimes of the authorities. Such "analysis" are pleasant to authorities, they, eventually, begin to refer to their "analysts", who demand for success to add tanks and planes. However behind a board of this idyll there is the population of their country, those who are sent from Caucasus in coffins, and those receives these coffins.
Mansur Mazaev, Chechenpress, 25.10.05.
http://chechenpress.co.uk/english/news/2005/10/25/02.shtml