Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

NatPress: Reference About Ethnonym “Circassian” Caused Public Interest

posted by eagle on June, 2010 as CIRCASSIA ADIGA


Reference about ethnonym "Circassian” caused public interest 

24 June 2010 – 10:09 pm – NatPress 
Source: ekhokavkaza.com

On the Circassian Internet-sites they actively discuss the opinion letter of the Institute of ethnology and anthropology of the Russian academy of sciences concerned the ethnonym "Circassian”. That document appeared on May, 25th 2010 being signed by the chief department on Caucasus of that institute professor Sergey Arutiunov. The main conclusion of the opinion letter is the following:

” Modern researches prove that the ethnic identity and the basic layer of the traditional culture of Shapsugs, Adygs, Circassians and Kabardians are common. It testifies to that it is possible to consider the named groups as sub-ethnoses of one nation - Circassian (Adygeyan) people”.

They also named as Adygs descendants of Ubyhs – the people which had lived till the middle of the XIX century in the upper flows of Sochi and Shahe rivers and almost all deported to the Ottoman empire:

"The present not numerous descendants of Ubyhs, or those who consider themselves as those (they were registered during the All-Russia census of 2002), have the All-Circassian identity, share the Circassian (Adygeyan) cultural traditions, identify themselves with the basic part of modern Circassian (Adygeyan) people”.

The opinion letter of the Institute of ethnology and anthropology appeared not accidentally and could be interesting not only from the scientific point of view. That document is the reply to the letter of the president of the International Circassian association Kanshobi Ajahov who had asked the most authorized Russian scientific instance to answer the question "Are Ubyhs, Shapsugs, Adygs, Circassians, Kabardians the sub-ethnoses of the one Circassian ethnos?”

That question for the leader of the public organization uniting Adygs without any dividing to sub-ethnoses and already in its name fixes the one ethnonym could seem rather strange. It is strange from the point of view of the academic science, too – that is the opinion of the historian, member of "Adyghe Khasa” of Krasnodar Asker Soht:

-I am surprised with that letter to the Russian academy of sciences. Because this question is so obvious that such requiring letter seems to be rather odd. As to the opinion letter it corresponds to what we have in reality. In the native language Adygs name themselves Adygs for already several centuries. So you can not hear anything new about it.

Still, the question has rather concrete contest. Russian empire as well as the Soviet Union not once had remade borders of the Adygeyan lands as the Adygeyan people was resettled in enclaves having got different names supposed as separate nationalities. Circassian national activists struggle with that dissociation. One of the elements of that struggle is agitation for registration of all the Adygs in the census of 2010 as "Circassians”. And in that the activists could find some help from the Institute of ethnology and anthropology. A. Soht considered:

- That opinion letter is connected with the census of 2010. Everybody knows that there is a tendency – calls up to the population to write during the census the ethnonym Circassians. And using that tradition, opponents of that idea had tried to develop false "about-scientific” approaches. But the academic science has no such problem. The opinion letter of the Russian academy of sciences will work for fixation of the one ethnonym. As to political consequences of that letter I do not expect them.

Further political prospects about which the historian speaks so pessimistic, is uniting of Circassian people not only under one name but also in one Circassian region. Asker Soht’s pessimism could be understood – historical scientific opinion letters have no influence on such decisions in Russia.


http://www.natpress.net/stat_e.php?id=5830


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Url

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search CIRCASSIA ADIGA



CIRCASSIA ADIGA



Archive


 december 2014

 march 2014

 february 2014

 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 january 2013

 december 2012

 november 2012

 october 2012

 september 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 june 2012

 may 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 january 2012

 december 2011

 november 2011

 october 2011

 september 2011

 august 2011

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 june 2008

 may 2008

 april 2008

 july 2007

 june 2007



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®