Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation



FP: Gazprom 'confused and corrupt': U.S. cables

posted by eagle on January, 2011 as ANALYSIS / OPINION

Gazprom 'confused and corrupt': U.S. cables

Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg
The logo of Gazprom is seen on a chimney at the company's gas compressor plant in Volokolamsk, Russia. Leaked U.S. cables on the company paint it in a very negative light.

Guy Faulconbridge, Reuters · Thursday, Jan. 6, 2011

MOSCOW — The Kremlin’s ambition of turning Gazprom, the world’s biggest gas company, into a global energy titan is undermined by Soviet-style thinking, poor management and corruption, according to leaked U.S. diplomatic cables.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and his protege, former Gazprom board chairman Dmitry Medvedev who is now Russia’s president, have tried to use Gazprom to claw back some of the international clout which Moscow lost after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

But leaked diplomatic cables from U.S. Ambassador to Moscow John Beyrle paint Russia’s biggest company as a confused and corrupt behemoth still behaving like its predecessor, the Soviet Ministry of Gas.

"Gazprom is what one would expect of a state-owned monopoly sitting atop huge wealth — inefficient, politically driven, and corrupt,” Beyrle wrote in a 2009 cable published by German magazine Der Spiegel on its website.

Gazprom spokesman Sergei Kupriyanov declined immediate comment on the documents, part of the 251,287 U.S. embassy cables released to news organisations by WikiLeaks.

The leaked cables cast Putin as Russia’s "alpha-dog” leader who allows a venal elite of corrupt officials to siphon off cash from energy sales, comments Russia’s leadership have dismissed.

Moscow-based Gazprom supplies a quarter of the European Union’s gas and has plans to increase its share of the European and Asian gas markets with vast pipeline projects that require tens of billions of dollars in investment.

During his presidency, Putin — helped by a then relatively unknown Kremlin official, Dmitry Medvedev — moved to reassert state control of Gazprom, appointing ally Alexei Miller as CEO.

The state-controlled company became an emblem of a resurgent Russia, snapping up assets at home and abroad, borrowing heavily and disrupting gas supplies to Europe in winter rows with former Soviet republics such as Ukraine.

But the economic crisis battered Gazprom and its market capitalisation is now just over US$150-billion, less than half its peak of more than US$350-billion reached in 2008.

Gazprom Strategy

The U.S. cables repeat the view of many Western and Russian analysts that Gazprom’s management misjudged the future by betting that soaring European demand would continue to support a seller’s market.

Instead Gazprom has faced demand destruction in Europe since 2009 as the global economic crisis forced European customers to slash consumption. They also often switched to liquefied gas from the Middle East, whose producers turned out to be much more flexible in their pricing policies than Gazprom.

"Gazprom was simply unprepared for the inevitable levelling off and current decline in European gas demand,” the U.S. ambassador said in the cables, adding that Gazprom misjudged the impact of liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports to Europe.

"Gazprom will have to cope with massive new volumes of LNG on the global market from projects already underway in Qatar and elsewhere,” he wrote.

Gazprom has repeatedly said it was keen to expand on U.S. gas markets but had to scale back its ambitions to supply liquefied gas (LNG) across the Atlantic as the United States boosted its own shale gas output and cut imports of LNG.

Gazprom is still clearly viewed as an instrument of Kremlin social policy, according to Beyrle, who cited a Gazprom executive as saying that the company’s first two priorities were to provide reliable and affordable gas to the domestic population and to "fulfil its social obligations.”

"A Gazprom that behaved more like a competitive global company would probably find a new path to growth more quickly,” Beyrle wrote.

"But Gazprom is not a competitive global company, despite sitting on the world’s largest gas reserves. Gazprom is a legacy of the old Soviet Ministry of Gas and it still operates much the same way,” he wrote.

© Thomson Reuters 2011

comments (0)

1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*



Verification code*


New Posts

Search Analysis Opinion



 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000

Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at:

Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®