Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Window On Eurasia: Internet Drive To Oust Putin Shows Saying ‘No’ To Powers That Be Is Again ‘Good Tone,’ Commentator Says

posted by eagle on April, 2010 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 2010

Window on Eurasia: Internet Drive to Oust Putin Shows Saying ‘No’ to Powers that Be is Again ‘Good Tone,’ Commentator Says

Paul Goble

Dayton, April 7 – The Internet petition calling for Vladimir Putin to leave office, a drive that has now garnered nearly 50,000 signatures, has not only helped to power many protests around the Russian Federation, but it has made it clear, one Moscow analyst says, that "saying ‘no’ to the powers that be is becoming a matter of good tone.”
That is the same thing that happened under Gorbachev, Andrey Nekrasov says, arguing that the response to the petition shows that "a taste for freedom has again begun to appear” in Russia, opening the way for the country to make up for the chance he suggests it missed 20 years ago (www.kasparov.ru/material.php?id=4BBAFD5190DC0).
Nekrasov suggests that the eternal question "What next?” should be split in two – "What are we able to do?” and "What response from the side of the powers that be should we be prepared for?” Because, he continues, "whether we want it or not, the fate of the movement for freedom in Russia is inevitably being resolved on the street.”
Obviously, the Kasparov.ru writer continues, "not every demonstration or march of the opposition in the recent past has been timely and effective.” But he suggests that "only there on the street does the people retain a chance to opposite its will to the manipulations being carried out in the television studios [and elsewhere] to conserve Putinism.”
The various opposition parties and movements, Nekrasov continues, must cooperate in organizing meetings and demonstrations with the focus on getting of Putin. The Internet has played an enormous role, but it is "a virtual reality” and now it is time for Russians to find the courage to get involved in the real reality of the streets.
As Russians do that – and the willingness of so many to sign the petition is evidence that more and more have found that spirit – they must face up to what the regime they are going to confront is like. It is "pragmatic and cynical, not ideological, despite Surkov,” Nekrasov says. And its "strength is not in ideology but in the OMON.”
Thus, the current powers that be are prepared to allow Russians some freedom in the virtual space of the Internet because those powers are confident that they can win any confrontation in the streets. This very cynicism, the Kasparov.ru commentator continues, undermines the regime but does not guarantee its fundamental change, at least anytime soon.
Indeed, one can see that "the moral dissolution [of the powers that be] is being compensated by the technical advantages of that cynicism,” which requires giving "preference to the means for effective physical defense [of the powers that be], including of course physical attacks” on their opponents.
Given that, Nekrasov argues, the opposition must realize that even though there are broader problems with the Russian political system, the country will only be able to move forward if they excise the cause of many of them, the continued presence in office of Vladimir Putin. To win, in short, the opposition needs to focus on that.
The source of Russia’s current illness, its "’native’ powers that be, is attacking Russian in all directions. Terrorism is the sharpest manifestation of the illness. And even if the state structures did not have any relation to what happened in the metro on March 29th, the powers that be bear responsibility for the tragedy.”
"Many Americans who hate Bush,” Nekrasov points out, view his role in preventing any repetition of terrorist attacks after September 11th in a very positive light. Unfortunately, Putin has not done as much. Instead, "the epoch of Putin is the epoch of chronic terrorism,” and he would already have been destroyed as a politician in any country "with free elections.””
No one is suggesting that Islamist terrorist are anything but criminals, but that in no way detracts from the fact, Nekrasov says, that in Russia over the last decade, the powers that be who have "usurped the power of the people” have "not been able to fulfill their basic function of guaranteeing the security of the citizens.”
The current Russian powers that be think they can detract attention either by cracking the whip or playing to cheap national patriotism. But in doing so, they "are playing a dangerous game of poker above all for themselves.” In contrast to 1999, the Russian people now "know rather more about the methods of the Kremlin strategists, PR specialists and special services.”
In fact, it is likely that "the number who considers it important to think for themselves about the causes of terrorism may exceed the number of those who want to beat the Caucasians instead of thinking.” That is evidence of real growth in the spirit of the population, and it is a reason, especially if Russians now go into the streets, for the powers that be to be very worried.
Nekrasov’s impassioned argument almost certainly overstates just how far public attitudes have shifted and how few resources the regime has to prevent them from going even further. But it is important as an indication of the increasing anger of the opposition and its willingness to focus on the need to get rid of Putin as a first step toward national recovery.
Three other developments in the last few days add to that sense. First, in an interview in "Yezhednevny zhurnal,” opposition leader Garri Kasparov describes both the difficulties of gaining cooperation with various opposition groups and the way in which they are being driven together by the attitudes of the public (ej.ru/?a=note&id=10000).
Second, there are indications that the leaders of some of the public protests about specific problems like rising rates for medicine and communal services are beginning to link up with some unions, thus limiting the ability of the powers to play divide and rule in that sector and providing a larger base for future protests (www.sobkorr.ru/news/4BBC666620696.html).
And third – and this may be the most important of all – there are indications that in the defense sector, there are some who now argue that Moscow’s failure to counter terrorism is the result of the country’s lack of a system in which officials have to answer to voters (www.vpk-news.ru/hot/defense/jug-federatsii-raduzhnye-otsenki-prezhdevremenny).

comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Url

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®