Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Window On Eurasia: New Russian Film Presents Andropov As Model Leader

posted by eagle on June, 2009 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 2009

Window on Eurasia: New Russian Film Presents Andropov as Model Leader

Paul Goble

Vienna, June 16 – A new film entitled “Yury Andropov. 15 Months of Hope” presents the longtime KGB head as the Soviet leader “most attractive for the Putin regime” because his brief reign as CPSU general secretary represents “that part of the Soviet past which is closest to the heart” of the current Russian prime minister, according to a liberal critic.
In a review of the movie, which was directed by Sergey Medvedev and shown yesterday on Moscow’s First Channel on the occasion of the Soviet leader’s 95th birthday, Boris Sokolov says that Andropov is presented as “a liberal authoritarian leader who wanted to put the state in order but would not resort to the use of Stalinist terror” (grani.ru/Politics/Russia/m.152434.html). 
Thus, when he was serving as chairman of the KGB, Andropov is presented as having decided “not to shoot the most important dissidents, not to put them in the camps, and even not to exile them to Siberia but only to send them abroad,” with no mention of his role in the use of psychiatric prisons against them.
Nor in the film is there any mention about the extent to which Andropov during his brief period in the country’s highest office tightened censorship even though, as Sokolov points out, it was “far from liberal even in Brezhnev’s times.” And in general, the Grani.ru writer says, “the film says only good things about Andropov.”
That positive view is achieved by the director’s careful selection of “talking heads” who either “were from the group of consultants Andropov created while head of the CPSU Central Committee’s socialist countries department or from among his subordinates in the Soviet embassy in Hungary and in the KGB.” 
“In order to make the image of Andropov more human,” Sokolov continues, the film describes his personal life in detail, his touching love for his second wife, and the poems which he read only in the closest circle” of friends – although reference is made to his first family which he “threw over on account of a new love or for his career” and then did not help.
But the film doesn’t focus on “such petty things.” Instead, it presents Andropov as someone who sought power only to save his country. And to that end, it presents the “legend” that Andropov’s final rise was decided only after Brezhnev’s death. “In fact,” as Sokolov notes, “Andropov became crown prince” earlier when chief ideologist Mikhail Suslov died.
A central message of the film, the liberal critic points out, is that “Andropov considered corruption the main evil” threatening the country, but he never recognized that “the level of corruption is inversely proportional to the level of the development of democracy” and so failed to bring it under control.
The film also suggests that Andropov wanted to “reform socialism” on the Hungarian model, apparently because of his experience there – although that experience involved the suppression of the 1956 revolution. But Andropov’s reforms, Sokolov reminds, were undercut by his preference for “tightening administrative control over the economy.”
Nor does the new film celebrating Andropov and his leadership style refer to the empty shelves the Soviet people confronted nor the hidden unemployment they suffered nor all the other problems of the USSR. But the film does make one thing perfectly clear to anyone who watches it, albeit almost certainly in spite of the intention of its creators. .
It shows, he says, that “the Soviet system was condemned and even an honest man, in the sense of someone like Andropov who did not take bribes and expensive gifts or give himself empty titles [as Brezhnev had] all the same could not do anything for the salvation of the system,” hardly the message supporters of today’s “liberal authoritarianism” want to deliver.

comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®