From: MSN NicknameEagle_wng  (Original Message)    Sent: 2/19/2007 8:24 AM
Charles Krauthammer
Putin postures for power
language=javascript type=text/javascript> var isoPubDate = 'February 19, 2007' </SCRIPT>
By Charles Krauthammer
language=javascript type=text/javascript> document.write('
'+isoPubDate+'
') </SCRIPT>
February 19, 2007
Opinion Columnist

Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, although the more accurate title would be godfather, made headlines last week with a speech in Munich that set a new standard in anti-Americanism.

He not only charged the U.S. with the "hyper-use of force," "disdain for the basic principles of international law" and having "overstepped its national borders in ... the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations."

He even blamed the spread of weapons of mass destruction, which the U.S. has been combating with few allies and against constant Russian resistance, on American "dominance" that "inevitably encourages" other countries to acquire them defensively.

There is something amusing about criticism of the use of force by the man who turned Chechnya into a smoldering ruin; about the invocation of international law by the man who won't allow Scotland Yard to interrogate the polonium-soaked thugs it suspects of murdering Alexander Litvinenko, another Putin opponent to meet an untimely and unprosecuted death; about the bullying of other countries decried by a man who cuts off energy supplies to Ukraine, Georgia and Belarus in brazen acts of political and economic extortion.

Less amusing is the greater meaning of Putin's speech. It marks Russia's coming out.

Flush with oil and gas revenues, the consolidation of dictatorial authority at home and capitulation of domestic and Western companies to his seizure of their assets, Putin issued his boldest declaration yet that post-Soviet Russia is preparing to reassert itself on the world stage.

Perhaps his most important line was the least noted, because it seemed so innocuous: "I very often hear appeals by our partners, including our European partners, to the effect that Russia should play an increasingly active role in world affairs. It is hardly necessary to incite us to do so."

Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko once boasted that no conflict anywhere on the globe could be settled without taking into account the attitude and interests of the Soviet Union.

Gromyko's description of Soviet influence constitutes the best definition ever formulated of the term superpower.

We know how Putin, who has called the demise of the Soviet Union the greatest political catastrophe of the 20th century, yearns for those superpower days.

At Munich, he couldn't even disguise his Cold War nostalgia, asserting "`global security" in those days was ensured by the "strategic potential of two superpowers."

Putin's bitter complaint is that there remains only one superpower, the behemoth that dominates a "unipolar world."

He knows he lacks the economic, military and even demographic means to challenge America as in Soviet days. He speaks more modestly of coalitions of aggrieved have-not countries Russia might lead in countering American power.

Hence his increasingly active foreign policy - military partnerships with China, nuclear cooperation with Iran, weapon supplies to Syria and Venezuela, diplomatic support as well as arms for a genocidal Sudan, friendly outreach to other potential partners of an anti-hegemonic (read: anti-American) alliance.

Is this a return to the Cold War? It's true the ex-KGB agent occasionally lets slip a classic Marxist anachronism such as "foreign capital" (referring to Western oil companies) or the otherwise weird adjective "vulgar" (describing the actions of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which infuriated Putin by insisting upon a clean election in Ukraine).

He even intimated he might undo one of the unequivocal achievements of the late Cold War era, the so-called zero-option agreement of 1987, and restore a Soviet-style medium-range ballistic missile force.

Nonetheless, Putin's aggressiveness doesn't signal a return to the Cold War. He's too clever to be burdened by the absurdity of socialist economics or Marxist politics. He's blissfully free of ideology, political philosophy and economic theory. There is no existential dispute with the United States.

He is a more-modest man: a mere Mafia don, seizing the economic resources and political power of a country for himself and his mostly KGB cronies.

And promoting his vision of the Russian national interest - assertive and expansionist - by engaging in diplomacy that challenges the dominant power in order to boost his own.

He wants Gromyko's influence - or at least some international acknowledgment Moscow must be reckoned with - without the ideological baggage.

He doesn't want to bury us. He only wants to diminish us.

It's 19th century power politics at its most crude and elemental. Putin doesn't want us as an enemy. At Munich he told the world that vis-à-vis America, his Russia has gone from partner to adversary.

Krauthammer is a syndicated columnist based in Washington. His e-mail address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com.

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070219/A_OPINION0602/702190310/-1/A_OPINION
language=javascript type=text/javascript> document.write(unescape(xtraFacts)); </SCRIPT>