Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Analysis: Is The Kremlin Looking To Dissolve Ethnic Republics?

posted by zaina19 on April, 2006 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


From: MSN NicknameEagle_wng  (Original Message)    Sent: 4/24/2006 2:17 AM
Friday, April 21, 2006
Analysis: Is The Kremlin Looking To Dissolve Ethnic Republics?
By Victor Yasmann
Russia -- map
The administrative shape of Russia might be in for an overhaul
(RFE/RL)
The 16 April referendum on merging southeastern Siberia's Irkutsk Oblast with Ust-Orda Buryat Autonomous Okrug offered the Kremlin a green light to reshape part of the federation, as voters cast their ballots in favor of the proposed reunification. Russian President Vladimir Putin had personally endorsed the merger during an April 5 meeting with the governors of the two regions. It was the fourth referendum in three years on merging an "ethnic" administrative region with a predominantly Slavic administrative body.

The integration process of ethnic-based regions into larger administrative territories and regions began in 2004, when residents of Perm Oblast and Komi-Permyak Autonomous Okrug voted in favor of merging their provinces into Perm Krai. This unification came into force on December 1, 2005.
 
The same year, the population of Krasnoyarsk Krai and the much smaller Evenk and Taimyr autonomous okrugs voted in favor of a similar union, which will come into being on January 1 2007 and be called Krasnoyarsk Krai. Also in 2005, Kamchatka Oblast and Koryak Autonomous Okrug in the Russian Far East approved a referendum that will result in their merger as of 1 January 2007.
The official explanation for such restructuring of the Russian Federation is economic. The Kremlin explains its support for these endeavors by saying it is easier to manage larger administrative territories from the federal center.
 
However, there are many signs that political considerations are behind the merger efforts, and that the Kremlin's real goal is effectively to dissolve the troublesome ethnic republics in the North Caucasus and Volga region. The weekly "Argumenty i fakty" in April (No. 15) published a map showing a potential restructuring of all of Russia's regions that would merge ethnic autonomous republics into larger administrative entities. The article was entitled: "How One Can Dissolve Ethnic-Based Regions."
 
The plan discussed in the weekly was drafted by the Council for the Study of Productive Resources (SOPS), a little-known but quite influential think tank that works for the office of Russia's government and prime minister. According to the plan, the Russian Federation would comprise 28 federal subjects, instead of the current 88.
 
The plan proposes the merger of all ethnic autonomous republics with neighboring Slavic administrative areas to form new provinces. It also suggests eliminating any reference to ethnicity in the names of the new provinces. In particular, the plan proposes to merge:

    *
       The Republic of Tatarstan with Ulyanovsk Oblast to create Volgo-Kama Province;

    *
       The Republic of Bashkortostan with Orenburg Oblast to create Yuzno-Ural Province;

    *
       The Republic of Udmurtia with Perm Krai to create Zapadno-Ural Province;

    *
       The republics of Mary El and Chavash with Kirov Oblast to create Volgo-Vyatka Province;

    *
       The republics of Kalmykia with Astrakhan, Volgograd, and Rostov oblasts to create Volgo-Don Province;

    *
      The republics of Chechnya, Ingushetia, Daghestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, and North Ossetia with Stavropol Krai to create North Caucasus Province;

    *
      The republics of Adygeya and Karachayevo-Cherkessia with Krasnodar Krai to create Prichenornormskaya Province.

    *
       Finally, the plan would abolish numerous autonomous ethnic regions in Siberia, the Urals, and northern Russia.

That the SOPS has formulated such a plan is not to be taken lightly. It was created in 1916, and for the past 90 years has systematically been involved in drafting major national projects both in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. In particular, the SOPS was involved in elaborating the Bolshevik plan of electrification known as GOELRO; it also participated in the preparation of the Soviet five-year economic plans that later became part of GOSPLAN.
 
More recently, the SOPS was behind the proposal in 1998 to divide Russia into seven federal districts, which was materialized by Putin in 2000. Today, the SOPS is working on further reshaping Russia' administrative composition.
 
The SOPS plan recently outlined in "Argumenty i fakty" harkens back to the administrative divisions that existed in Russia prior to the 1917 revolution. The idea to return to prerevolutionary Russia was first raised 15 years ago by the leader of Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who often speaks what Russia's ruling elite has in mind. Zhirinovsky referred at the time to the fact that Russia was divided into eight provinces under Peter the Great; into 40 under Catherine the Great; and into 56 just before the 1917 revolution. The current proposal to redefine the administrative configuration of the Russian Federation seems to have been initiated and backed by the Kremlin, and is definitely in line with Zhirinovsky's suggestion.
 
In practical terms, this proposal would mean that the 1993 Russian Constitution, which set up the current administrative division of the Russian Federation, would have to be revised. The supporters of a centralized, unitarian state have recently become more vocal and are demanding that the process be sped up.
 
Aleksei Mitrofanov, one of the LDPR's leading figures, was quoted as saying in "Argumenty i fakty," No. 15, that: "We should adopt a new constitution that includes a new administrative division. Otherwise, it will take some 50 years to dismantle, first [autonomous] districts, then, slowly, republics."
 
It is unclear, however, how realistic the Kremlin's attempts to eliminate national republics are. So far, Moscow has had mixed results. In 2003, for example, the Kremlin attempted to unify Irkustsk Oblast and the Ust-Ordinsky Buryatsk Autonomous Okrug into a new administrative body, but the governors of the two regions began squabbling over who would control major financial assets and the Kremlin subsequently backed away. It took three years and the replacement of Irkustsk Oblast's governor for the Kremlin to finally reach its goal.
 
Also, in March 2006 Moscow reportedly postponed an attempt to merge Adygeya Republic with Krasnodar Krai, after Adygeya President Khazret Sovmen resisted the idea. Dmitry Oreshkin, a senior expert with the Russian Academy of Science's Geography Institute told "Argumenty i fakty" that the Kremlin's merger efforts can only work in small ethnic entities. "But how can they dissolve a 5.5 million-inhabitant-strong Tatarstan?" he said. "Such attempts can only offend Tatars."
 
In turn, Rostislav Murzagulov, a close aide to Republic of Bashkortostan President Murtaza Rakhimov, told the weekly: "One needs to cool the hot heads demanding the abolishment of nations and the unification of everything."
 
The next few months should bring an answer to whether the Kremlin will listen to moderate voices calling for the maintenance of the status quo, or whether they will favor a return to dealing with the issue of nationalities through the prism of imperial Russia, when the country was not a federation, but a unitarian state administered by governors appointed by a tsar.
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/04/bf40bf21-32aa-4bfe-8a2f-e87f4bd027e8.html


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®