Anna Politkovskaya was an outstanding woman, devoted writer, and Human Rights activist. On October 7th 2006, a group of cowards assassinated her because they were afraid to face the truth. She was murdered because she exposed the crimes of the Russian government. Throughout the years Politkovskaya had been tracked down, followed, and investigated but that did not discourage her. Even after several failed assassination attempts, she kept going because she knew that she possessed a gift that was no match for the Russian government. She had the gift of writing, and wrote about the facts. Anna revealed the secrets that government tried kept hidden, and exposed their evil deeds. Even though her life was at stake she never gave up, she knew that it was her duty to keep the world informed. The world will never forget her. We salute Anna Politkovskaya.
posted by Justice For North Caucasus - Anna Politkovskaya. on June, 2002 as Anna Politkovskaya
A WAR WITHOUT HEROES “A nation where the number of heroes is regarded restricted information meant only for those officials who give out awards while real heroes get no awards at all is powerless indeed. It will lose all its wars, because it is always in the wrong place and on the wrong side”.
It’s difficult to argue with these bitter words of Anna Politkovskaya, especially since the author of these lines was as unsuccessful in his attempts to reach the Department (or the entire Directorate now, which is unbelievable!) for State Awards attached to the president’s administration. My attempts to talk to their long–time and elusive boss, Nina Sivova, at least by phone, failed too (she was on a sick leave… on a business trip… meeting with her superiors… caught a cold…). And why did I need her? Just to find out how many people had received awards for the previous Chechen war, the First one…
Politkovskaya finally managed to reach her only to hear: “… This information is classified… for the sake of security. We do not want those persons to have any trouble…”
The response of the government official is just fantastic: the heroes of the bloody war are now afraid. Or maybe somebody is concerned about their safety. The statement of Sivova can also be interpreted one more way: it is safer being in a war zone than in civilian life in your own apartment, and the huge state machinery is incapable of guarding its heroes!
But why should they be guarded and from whom? And what did they do if their names are classified and they have to hide from revenge? We find the answer on the same pages of Politkovskaya’s book: a war is being waged which is not a sacred, popular undertaking, but rather a dirty, bloody and criminal business. Can there be any heroes among dragoons?
Sometimes you may come across some heroes though, for people are different, and not all are murderers. Anna Politkovskaya tells about Magomed Yandiev, a colonel in the Ingush police force who risked his own life to bring 89 elderly people out of a retirement home in besieged Grozny. He was recommended for the “Hero of Russia” decoration. He did not get this award, and never will! For “Yandiev is an Ingush, and Ingushes cannot be trusted”. It isn’t even his nationality that matters, for Hero bars are conferred on murderers rather than rescuers. This is why Putin will never approve the highest award for rescuers… And now Magomed Yandiev is sitting in front of me – an ordinary hero of the sick nation. He never robbed or raped anyone, nor did he slip the trophy women’s underwear into the bosom of his camouflage. He rescued people.
For this very reason he is not a general, and his ‘Hero’ papers are rotting in Moscow safes.
Though an old truth says that a feat is the other side of someone’s baseness and sloppiness, you should agree that a war without heroes is not only an appalling, but a devastating diagnosis.
It is this side of the war without heroes that Politkovskaya describes in her Novaya Gazeta every week. Her main character is simple and unpretentious: a man in a Chechen street, not necessarily a Chechen by nationality, more often a common man in the street who does not care about the political or economic background of the bloodshed, even less so about the stratagem behind it. His main burden is how to survive always and anywhere: under bombardment, mop–ups and aviation raids, when crossing a minefield, passing a post or going to a marketplace, when you may run into a landmine, a stray bullet or the same mop-up. Our tired average man with a heap of his own problems does not know anything about this side of “living” in the territory which is humbly designated as “the zone of the counter-terrorist operation”. And in all sincerity we should admit that he is not willing to feel any empathy. If asked he would condemn militants and call for carpet bombing them. When he is bored with the news, he simply switches his TV-set to a different channel where it shows in a serial how these bearded men are wiped out in public places by cool guys wearing masks and camouflage.
However, the average man refuses to accept the truth of the matter: they do not wipe out militants, but rather the same kind of average men engaged in making a living, and they don’t do it in a battle, but rather in everyday life. Nor would the average man know anything about the mop–ups which degenerated into marauding massacres long ago. The average man plugs his ears, refusing to hear anything about the cruel tortures inflicted not on captives, but on commoners like himself seized in their own homes, streets or at military posts. Our snug average man wouldn’t even want to admit to himself that men in masks and camouflage are common district police officers from the Motor Licensing and Inspection Department, or colonels (like Budanov) who work there in a “trade” which is not mentioned in reference-books –“sadism”. They charge people for everything: for passing through a post, for the bodies of their loved ones, for the redemption of the living and for many other “services”.
The characters of Politkovskaya are real, not fictional, and that horrifies (if anyone is still capable of feeling any horror): they are refugees, officials, brigands in uniform and without it. And there’s actually not a single person worthy of emulation, as they used to say several dozen years ago. Certainly it is neither the rapist and sadist Budanov, the former mufti Kadyrov, nor 16-year-old Magomed Idigov who was tortured with electric current, had German shepards set on him, led to the place of execution, and whose kidneys and lungs were badly damaged…
This book will hardly be a big success. Pain is a poor commodity, even when it is in print. And Politkovskaya’s book is so packed with appalling pain and horror, that the reader feels sick at once, imagining himself in this concentration camp! Only personal military experience helps get through this book, though the reading is like torture. I haven’t felt such hopelessness since the days of horror that I experienced in the cellar of a Grozny five-storied panel house which was being bombed during the winter assault of the First war. The absolute gloom and hopelessness of the war has become a way of life, a livelihood for countless officials, a way of functioning for the entire nation.
They may reproach (and they actually do) the military reporter Politkovskaya: yours is a one-sided picture; it shows nothing bright, only hangmen and their victims. But that’s how it is. And who could give a comprehensive and all-round “picture” of this gloom? Someone must make at least some of us take a look into our national military machine. Someone must show us our possible future so that none might be able to say later, when jackboots rumble nearby and a “filter” operation with all its “delights” touches the indifferent with its tender bony hand: “We didn’t know anything and hadn’t been forewarned…”
Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom
Russian London 15 октября 2004, 12:28
She has been poisoned by men she suspects worked for Russia's secret service and held in a pit in Chechnya for three days by men she knows for certain worked for the successor of the KGB. But Anna Politkovskaya, Russia's most famous investigative journalist and the most outspoken member of the country's increasingly enfeebled media establishment, has not buckled under the pressure. Yesterday her most searing critique of the Russian government to date, a book entitled Putin's Russia, was published in the UK. Its contents are likely to send the Kremlin's spin doctors into paroxysms of anger for she paints her main subject, President Vladimir Putin, in a devastating light. Deploying her legendary blunt prose to great effect, she savages the man she calls "a KGB snoop," and warns that he is moving the country back to a Soviet-style dictatorship. She also does what Moscow has so far miserably failed to achieve: present a roadmap for peace in Chechnya. At a time when the Russian media is falling over itself to fawn over Mr Putin and sustain a Soviet-style cult of personality around him, her work provides a lone dissenting voice and a voice that cannot be heard in Russia - at least outside the pages of her liberal newspaperNovaya Gazeta. Politkovskaya does what few other Russian commentators dare and steps over an invisible line, mocking Mr Putin in an intensely personal way; comparing him to Soviet leader Josef Stalin, to a pathetic literary creation of Nikolay Gogol's and to a bland, over-promoted spy who should never have been elevated to the dizzy Kremlin heights. She paints a relentlessly bleak view of the state of Russia today chastising those in the West whom she says the status quo "suits" and, depressingly, holds out little or no hope for improvement. In a frank interview with The Independent yesterday she said she was fearful for the future of a country she loved, and hoped against the odds that a viable form of democracy might take hold one day. "Under President Putin we won't be able to forge democracy in Russia and will only turn back to the past. I am not an optimist in this regard and so my book is pessimistic. I have no hope left in my soul. Only a change of leadership would allow me to have hope but it's a political winter. The Kremlin is turning the country back to its Soviet past." Admitting that her book is staunchly anti-Putin, she claims that the Russian leader rues the day in 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed and is in the process of rebuilding his own version of the USSR which has already started to seriously impinge upon people's basic freedoms. "My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again," she said. "In an Empire there are only cogs." Describing how Mr Putin has been careful to sideline any viable opponents, she argues, however, that Russia's liberals, thrashed at the ballot box and discredited in the eyes of many Russians, are still a force to be reckoned with. "There are many people in Russia who would be strong leaders," she said. "You might think they have their faults but nothing could be worse than Putin." Aligning herself strongly with the country's liberal forces, she argues that Russia cannot leave Mr Putin at the helm until 2008 and says that fresh elections need to be held before then. "Because Putin, a product of the country's murkiest intelligence service, has failed to transcend his origins and stop behaving like a lieutenant-colonel in the KGB. He is still busy sorting out his freedom-loving fellow countrymen; he persists in crushing liberty just as he did earlier in his career." "We no longer want to be slaves, even if that is what best suits the West. We demand our right to be free." Poking fun at Mr Putin, she compares him to the humble Tsarist clerk, Akaky Akakievich, a famous literary creation of Russian author Nikolay Gogol. The wretched Akakievich believed the key to being successful and popular lay with his expensive overcoat. He was concerned only with his own image but when the overcoat was stolen he discovered that his own soul was empty. Politkovskaya told The Independent: "Putin is like Gogol's Akaky Akakievich. He is a small grey person who really wants not to be grey. Putin had a historic chance to be great and not to be grey but he is still grey." More dangerously she is convinced that Mr Putin has only contempt for ordinary Russians and democracy. "During the presidential pre-election campaign (this year) he behaved exactly like Stalin. He destroyed the democratic opposition, pulled the wool over people's eyes, refused to even debate and constantly lied about Chechnya and about social reforms. They say we have a happy country but we do not. It is a poor country. Putin doesn't respect people and repression will follow just as it did with Stalin." Elaborating on a personally harrowing experience earlier this year she describes how men she suspects were Russian secret service agents prevented her from getting to Beslan on 1 September where pro-Chechen extremists were holding some 1,200 hostages in a school. Politkovskaya had played a role in negotiations with Chechen rebels in 2002 during an ultimately tragic hostage situation in a Moscow theatre and felt her neutral status could come in handy once again. On 1 September she phoned her rebel contacts and pleaded with them to allow Aslan Maskhadov, former Chechen president and rebel leader, to journey to Beslan and persuade the hostage-takers to release their captives. Having agreed to fly to Beslan and negotiate a safe passage for Maskhadov she set off for the airport. "My last contact with Maskhadov's people was ten minutes before I got on the plane. I suppose I did more than a journalist normally does. I then got on the plane and drank some tea and then ... nothing." Politkovskaya had been poisoned, she said: "I don't remember anything else. I don't know but can surmise what happened. 'They' had decided that I needed to 'be dealt with' though not killed. A decision was taken and a middle-ranking (FSB) officer fulfilled it." The veteran reporter's voice tightened when asked how she felt the authorities handled the Beslan siege in which 344 people, over half of them children, died. "I didn't see what happened because I was unconscious but I believe the presidential administration, which was pulling all the strings, was cowardly. "One and a half days passed and nobody went to negotiate with the bandits because the presidential administration opposed such a move. It was a tragedy." Politkovskaya has had some unpleasant tangles with the authorities in the past. In 2000 her life was threatened by a Russian police officer because she had spoken out about an individual being kidnapped; she was forced into hiding. In February 2001 there was worse to come. Accused of being a spy for Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev, the man who claims he masterminded Beslan, she was held in a pit for three days by the FSB without food or water. Chechnya and its complex vortex of hatred and violence have fascinated Politkovskaya since 1999 when she first started reporting from the breakaway region. She has been back countless times since documenting in minute detail the terrible suffering of ordinary Chechens and the state of the demoralised, brutalised Russian forces. She said yesterday she took no sides in the conflict and had no truck with the likes of Basayev whatever the Kremlin may or may not think. "He (Basayev) asked me to come and interview him once but I refused. After Budennovsk (in 1995 when Chechen rebels took 1,600 people hostage in a hospital in southern Russia) I thought there was nothing to talk about. There are no heroes and no angels in Chechnya. The war there has been going on for so long that there are only people who are interested in continuing it ... And then there are the people, stuck in the middle." After Beslan, Politkovskaya says she wrote a letter to Mr Putin with her ideas for a peaceful settlement of the Chechen problem, urging the Kremlin to turn its back on Ramzan Kadyrov, Chechnya's Moscow-backed deputy prime minister. Politkovskaya's peace plan involved demilitarisation, international peacekeepers, a crack-down on corruption and the creation of a federal commission to govern the region. "It would be made up of non governmental organisations and civil society groups who have worked in Chechnya through the two wars and who are trusted. Of course I didn't get a response to my letter." Politkovskaya concedes she is afraid, but has no intention of shutting up. "Of course I'm afraid (of speaking out). Everyone is afraid in the current situation. I would be delighted if the Kremlin reacted to my book. It would mean that someone had got through to them but I think there will only be a deafening silence." The book is not published in Russia. 'WHY I DISLIKE PUTIN' The return of the Soviet system with the consolidation of Putin's power is obvious. It has to be said that this has not only been made possible by our own negligence, apathy and weariness after too much revolutionary change. It has happened to choruses of encouragement from the West, primarily from Silvio Berlusconi, who appears to have fallen in love with Putin. He is Putin's main European champion, but Putin also enjoys the support of Blair, Schröder and Chirac, and receives no discouragement from the transatlantic junior Bush. So nothing stood in the way of our KGB man's return to the Kremlin, neither the West nor any serious opposition within Russia. Throughout the so-called election campaign, from 7 December 2003 until 14 March 2004, Putin openly derided the electorate. The main token of his contempt was his refusal to debate anything with anyone. He declined to expand on a single point of his own policies in the last four years. His contempt extended not only to representatives of the opposition parties but to the very concept of an opposition. He made no promises about future policy and disdained campaigning of any kind. Instead, as under the Soviet regime, he was shown on television every day, receiving top-ranking officials in his Kremlin office and dispensing his highly competent advice on how to conduct whichever ministry or department they came from. There was, of course, a certain amount of tittering among members of the public: he was behaving just like Stalin. Putin too was simultaneously "the friend of all children" and "the nation's first pig-farmer", "the best miner", the "comrade of all athletes" and the "leading film-maker"... Why do I so dislike Putin? Because the years are passing. This summer it will be five since the second Chechen war was instigated. It shows no sign of ending. At that time the babies who were to be declared shaheeds [martyrs] were yet unborn, but all the murders of children since 1999 in bombardments and purges remain unsolved, uninvestigated by the institutions of law and order. The infanticides have never had to stand where they belong, in the dock; Putin, that great "friend of all children", has never demanded that they should. The army continues to rampage in Chechnya as it was allowed to at the beginning of the war, as if its operations were being conducted on a training ground empty of people. This massacre of the innocents did not raise a storm in Russia. Not one television station broadcast images of the five little Chechens who had been slaughtered. The Minister of Defence did not resign. He is a personal friend of Putin and is even seen as a possible successor in 2008. The head of the air force was not sacked. The commander-in-chief himself made no speech of condolence. Around us, it was business as usual in the rest of the world... Why do I so dislike Putin? This is precisely why. I dislike him for a matter-of-factness worse than felony, for his cynicism, for his racism, for his lies, for the gas he used in the Nord-Ost siege, for the massacre of the innocents which went on throughout his first term as President.
Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: