Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Jamestown Foundation: Ingush-Ossetian Relations Show Signs Of Improvement

posted by eagle on September, 2010 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


Ingush-Ossetian Relations Show Signs of Improvement

Publication: North Caucasus Analysis 
September 27, 2010 05:27 PM 




On December 17, Ingushetia’s President Yunus-bek Yevkurov and the head of North Ossetia, Taimuraz Mamsurov, signed an agreement on developing good-neighborly relations between the two republics. The agreement stipulates a plan of joint actions for the republican governments and government controlled civil organizations in 2010. Drawing on the importance of the agreements, Yevkurov stated it was a landmark day in the history of both peoples –the Ingush and the Ossetians (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru, December 17). The well-known liberal Russian economist Andrei Illarionov rated the agreement between Yevkurov and Mamsurov as the most important event in domestic Russian politics in 2009 (Independent Information Center, December 29).

The agreement aims to end the longstanding tensions between Ingushetia and North Ossetia over the disputed Prigorodny district of North Ossetia and its capital Vladikavkaz. The Ingush side laid claims to territory in neighboring North Ossetia that once belonged to Ingushetia, and the dispute finally erupted into large scale violence in fall 1992. Hundreds of people were killed in a short but bitter war and tens of thousands of ethnic Ingush –up to 60,000 people– were forced to leave North Ossetia or fled fearing for their lives following the conflict.

Numerous attempts to reconcile the two republics had been made prior to the latest agreement, but they had limited results. The issues of the disputed territory, the refugees’ return and concerns for their safety have remained points of contention between the governments of Ingushetia and North Ossetia. Even though the Ingush refugees were partially allowed to return to their homes, some areas in North Ossetia, including Vladikavkaz, have remained off limits to the return of Ingush refugees. "The ultimate aim [of the agreement] can be only one thing: the return to the Prigorodny district of absolutely all the Ingush people who left it,” stated the Ingush presidential spokesman Kaloi Akhilgov. North Ossetian leader Taimuraz Mamsurov, for his part, stressed the necessity of finding solutions to the problems shared by both neighboring republics, such as poor economic development, corruption and crime (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru, December 17).

As an oblique sign that the agreement is being forced upon the regional leaders rather than a product of internal and voluntary development, there has been little information about its actual contents. There was no public discussion prior to the signing of the agreement either in Ingushetia or North Ossetia. Instead, the leaders of both republics made several conciliatory statements that apparently were meant to pave way for the introducing the plan for yet another final settlement.

The Russian government plans to invest 7 billion rubles ($230 million) into the economy of the Prigorodny district in an attempt to create jobs for the returning Ingush refugees (Regnum news agency, December 17). For the Prigorodny district, with its current population of little more than 100,000, this investment is substantial, provided it is used with prudence.

The disastrous security situation in Ingushetia may have been one of the main drivers behind the latest attempt to return the Ingush refugees to their homes in North Ossetia. Little Ingushetia has become arguably the hottest spot in the volatile North Caucasus region, where attacks, abductions, clashes between government forces and the insurgency are almost a daily routine. The Ingush religious authorities and elders, an important and respected institution in Ingushetia, asked President Dmitry Medvedev to help stop what they called in their address the "elimination of the Ingush population” in the past several years (www.ingushetiyaru.org, December 19). On several occasions, President Yevkurov conveyed the message that resolving the Ingush refugees issue would undermine the influence of "extremists.” Yevkurov is himself a live victim of the destabilization in Ingushetia, having barely survived a suicide bomber attack in June 2009, which added an extra weight to his words. Moscow may have been convinced that facilitating the Ingush refugees’ return would provide a way out of the unending low-key civil war in Ingushetia by soothing the sensitive issue of the territorial dispute over Prigorodny district.

However, at the same time, the mass return of the Ingush refugees will hardly be received well in North Ossetia, where locals have little real experience of co-existence with the Ingush, but have heard much about deadly attacks in Ingushetia and Ingush participation in the Beslan school hostage drama in 2004. Therefore, Moscow will have to strike a careful balance between pushing the Ossetians and the Ingush to find a permanent settlement and at the same time avoiding alienating these two peoples.

Another unexpected result of the mass return of the Ingush refugees to North Ossetia might be the spread of Islamic extremism and its related insurgency to the relatively quiet North Ossetia. Even though North Ossetian officials, contrary to various reports, deny there is a problem with Islamic insurgency in the republic, the republican authorities decided to put up banners in the streets to fight extremism and terrorism (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru, December 30). This can be interpreted as a tacit acknowledgement of the presence of an Islamic insurgency in North Ossetia, where Muslims make up approximately 25 to 30 percent of the total population. Moreover, the head of South Ossetian Orthodox Church pointed out that Wahhabi cells were already present even on the South Ossetian religious landscape, where previously there had been no Muslim tradition at all (www.osinform.biz, December 19).

If the insurgency and the law enforcement agencies expand their war to North Ossetia, it may even trigger another outbreak of the Ossetian-Ingush conflict, as the questionable practices of the security services will be rendered even more irksome by adding an ethnic dimension to the fight.

It already looks as if, by transferring a portion of the Ingush population to North Ossetia, Moscow is delegating the North Ossetian government the authority to deal with the insurgents. Sources in Ingushetia recently complained about the abduction of a 60 year-old Ingush man in the Prigorodny district and his torture and mistreatment by North Ossetian police (www.ingushetiyaru.org, December 16, 30).

http://www.jamestown.org/programs/ncw/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=36953&tx_ttnews[backPid]=24&cHash=64ddb5a59f


comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Url

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®