Cultivating a Martial Spirit
In the wake of war, Georgia adds "military patriotism” to the curriculum. Part two of a series.
by Tamar Kickacheishvili 16 March 2010
This is the second in a series of articles on the challenges to education in post-conflict societies.
In mid-January, Nona Mikiashvili found out that her 11-year-old son,
Lasha, would begin studying something the authorities here are calling
military patriotism in the fall.
Lasha was excited at the prospect that he might get to handle a
weapon, but his mother had doubts. "I don’t object to a military course
if it includes emergency situations, but it should never be mandatory
for all students,” she said. "As for patriotism, it’s impossible to
teach at school. I’m really curious how they’re going to teach it. What
will they do? Telling students that we [Georgians] are the best, only
to have them find out differently later in life, it might cause
problems.”
Lasha also does not know what to expect from the new lessons in
patriotism. He understands that a patriot loves his country, he said,
but "Can someone teach you how to love?” he wondered.
President Mikheil Saakashvili’s announcement about mandatory
military patriotism courses in public schools came about a year and a
half after the August 2008 war between Georgia and Russia. Presidential
spokeswoman Manana Manjgaladze said military-patriotic education, part
of a package of proposals by Saakashvili and Education Minister Dimitry
Shashkin, would include training in civil defense and cultivating a
martial spirit, "which historically was always in the nature of the
Georgian people.”
MODERNIZING AN OLD IDEA
The ministry is still working on the curriculum for the course.
Natia Jokhadze, director of the National Curriculum and Assessment
Center, said the new curriculum will be ready by the fall and classes
will start in the upcoming school year. She said military patriotism
classes will be taught at every grade level and they will include civic
participation, civil defense, and emergency situations.
The announcement of the course has raised fears about the possible
militarization of the country’s schools and questions about how
patriotism will be defined.
David Zurabishvili, one of the leaders of the nonparliamentary
opposition Republican Party of Georgia, said the inclusion of civil
defense is simply to give a pretty shape to an ugly idea. "The
president announced it, and now the Ministry of Education is trying to
figure out how to soft-pedal it to our society. This initiative amounts
to militarization, and the idea that everyone must be a militant is the
wrong approach,” Zurabishvili said.
Saakashvili was not the first to broach the idea of patriotism
classes. In November, Irakli Aladashvili, editor in chief of the
military magazine Arsenali, said military education should be
taught in public schools. "I think that the upbringing of the
motherland’s defenders should start at the school desk,” Aladashvili
said, calling for classes in civil defense, first aid, and, optionally,
weaponry.
In light of Georgia’s recent experience with military conflicts in
South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Aladashvili said its citizens should be
able to defend themselves. "We shouldn’t be compared with other
countries that never experienced war. We had wars within the country as
well as in the Caucasus region. I covered the war in Chechnya as well.
And I think that Georgian students should study military patriotism,”
Aladashvili said.
In the Soviet era students were given military lessons, and some
countries in the Commonwealth of Independent States still have the
subject in their curricula. The textbook for those classes typically
included praise for the Communist Party and its ideology. Aladashvili
said it would be key that the new classes should not be used to
indoctrinate students. "I think politics should not have any place in
this modern military patriotism course. It should just be about
patriotic souls.”
PATRIOTISM WITHOUT MILITARISM?
Confused parents are not the only ones uneasy about the new courses.
Some opposition politicians say it’s a distraction from Tbilisi’s
bungling confrontation with Russia. "The Georgian government wants to
replace people’s disappointment with a sense of patriotism. They’re
just trying to cover up their mistakes and the pain of a lost war with
this new initiative,” said Guguli Magradze, leader of the Women’s
Party, a member of the opposition Alliance for Georgia.
Better to offer peace education in schools given Georgia’s recent history, Magradze said.
"Peace is the only thing that would give Georgia a chance to take
its normal place on the geopolitical map of the world,” Magradze said.
More perniciously, Magradze said, the authorities are hoping to
cultivate a more pliable citizenry with such courses. "This subject is
in the interests of the ruling party, for the purposes of having
obedient citizens who obey the dictates of authority. They want slaves.
This idea should cause protest in our society,” she said.
Tamar Chabashvili, principal of a secondary school in central Tbilisi, disagrees.
Calling the new courses "extremely necessary,” Chabashvili said the
project would help bring up a new generation of patriots and active
citizens. "I think that this subject should include the history and
present of the country, including the battles that Georgia had in
Abkhazia and the war that happened last year in South Ossetia. It must
be a mandatory subject,” she said.
Pavle Tvaliashvili, a consultant on education management and reform
at the private Center for Training and Consultancy in Tbilisi, said a
course that teaches students how to behave in emergencies would be
welcome. Nor would he have a problem with a course that aims to instill
patriotism.
"I think that patriotism should be used to teach the important
values of mankind such as peace, responsibility, freedom, love. … In my
opinion, it’s wrong to kill others. However, sometimes when someone
attacks you, you must be ready to defend yourself,” Tvaliashvili said.
Psychologist Gaga Nizharadze, who has written extensively about
post-Soviet culture and behavior, said he fears the courses could fuel
an increase in violence or bullying among students. Nizharadze said
patriotism cannot be taught in a classroom. "Patriotism is not a
subject, it’s a personal characteristic and that’s why it’s impossible
to have separate lessons in it and to teach it this way,” he said.
Nizharadze said the decision to give elementary school students
military courses suggests that the country’s priority has become
militarization.
"Actually I’m against teaching patriotism or any other ideology at
school. The only ideology in a democratic country should be that all
ideologies are equal,” Nizharadze said.
Tamar Kickacheishvili is a reporter for Georgia Today,
an English-language newspaper.Home page photo by Rob Sinclair.
http://www.tol.org/client/article/21264-cultivating-a-martial-spirit.html