Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Window On Eurasia: Putting Kadyrov In Charge Of North Caucasus Risky For The Region, For Moscow And For Chechen Leader Himself

posted by eagle on November, 2009 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009

Window on Eurasia: Putting Kadyrov in Charge of North Caucasus Risky for the Region, for Moscow and for Chechen Leader Himself

Paul Goble

Vienna, November 27 – Ever since President Dmitry Medvedev suggested in his message to the Federal Assembly two weeks ago that there should be a single official responsible for the situation in the North Caucasus, there has been a great deal of speculation about whether Moscow might name Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov to such a post.
But while Moscow may yet take that step, observers there and in the North Caucasus are pointing out that it would be a risky one for the region, parts of which would resent such a role for the Chechen leader, Moscow, which could thus face even more instability, and Kadyrov himself, who might have to give up his current job for one in with less independent power.
An article posted today on the Kavkaz-uzel.ru site surveys some of the discussion in Moscow about both this post and Kadyrov’s fitness for it and then reports on how this possibility is viewed in Grozny, a perspective that may prove decisive not only for Moscow but also for Kadyrov’s willingness to take such a job (www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/162475/).
In his November 12 address, Medvedev said that he had ordered the Russian government to come up with by January 1 not only a list of “criteria” to evaluate the effectiveness of federal policies in the North Caucasus but also to appoint an official “personally responsible for the situation in this region.”
Sergey Naryshkin, head of the presidential administration, added that such an official must have “sufficient power for coordinating the activities of power.” And Arkady Dvorkovich, an assistant to the president that that the official must be able to give “assignments to ministers, heads of various organs of power, and enjoy a status” with leaders in the region.
These remarks prompted some to focus on the possibility that the new official would be a military man, a former Federal District head or another outsider capable of imposing Moscow’s will (www.rian.ru/politics/20091121/194842720.html, www.nr2.ru/northwest/258108.html, and www.rg.ru/2009/11/20/evkurov.html).
But almost immediately, the possibility that Moscow would choose Kadyrov took center stage, not only because Russian officials have presented his rule in Chechnya as a successful one but also because Kadyrov has repeatedly indicated that he and his regime are ready and able to bring order in Ingushetia and even further afield.
The attention to Kadyrov was strengthened when Vladimir Varfolomeyev, the deputy chief editor at Ekho Moskvy, posted a note on his blog in which he said that the Kremlin had “almost decided” on the Chechen president. The only thing “unresolved,” Varfolomeyev said, was “a single formal but principled question.”
That was, the Ekho Moskvy editor said, “whether after gaining the status of a federal vice prime minister, Ramzan Kadyrov would retain as well his position as head of Chechnya” – a matter of some concern to Kadyrov of course because Chechnya serves as his own independent power base.
In Chechnya itself, Kavkaz-uzel.ru reports, Moscow’s recent decision to give Kadyrov the rank of militia general and put the operational staff of Russian forces in Chechnya under his control suggests that the Chechen president will be given the new position Medvedev has outlined. 
According to one Chechen political commentator, speaking on condition of anonymity, the proposal of the Russian president raises many questions because of the complexity of relations among Moscow, the Southern Federal District, the heads of the security services, and the leaders of the republics in the North Caucasus.
But however things turn out, the commentator continued, Ramzan Kadyrov is a real candidate for this post.” First of all, he enjoys the “colossal” trust of Moscow and especially Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Second, Kadyrov has shown himself willing to use force to stabilize the situation. And third, his new MVD rank boosts his status with the force structures.
Perhaps even more indicative that Kadyrov would like such a post, the anonymous commentator continued, is his recent suggestion that he considers Adam Delimkhanov as his successor, an indication that Kadyrov would like to have new worlds to conquer, something “the Kremlin also understands.
Another Chechen observer, also speaking anonymously, said that it was not the case that all the other North Caucasus leaders would oppose such a move. “Naturally, the appointment of Kadyrov as ‘first among equals’ could not please the leaders of other regions. But this does not mean that they would not subordinate themselves to him.”
“All of them,” he continued, are bureaucrats appointed by the Kremlin, and they recognize that they can be deprived of their posts at any moment.” But that applies to Kadyrov as well, and because that is the case, it is possible that the appointment of the Chechen president to this new post could cost him his power in his own republic.
“Taking into account the unpredictable quality of the actions of the Russian powers that be,” the commentator added, “one must not exclude the possibility that they simply want to remove Kadyrov from Chechnya, deprive him of his military support, and then remove him from all other things as well.”
“That Ramzan Kadyrov is still in favor with Putin,” he concluded, “does not mean that Medvedev likes him.” Indeed, the Russian president’s proposal could be the clearest possible indication that the Kremlin leader wants a new direction in the North Caucasus, very different from the one Kadyrov and Putin have pursued.

comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®