Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

Moscow critical of Burns’ comment on Duma election monitoring

posted by zaina19 on November, 2007 as ANALYSIS / OPINION


From: MSN NicknameEagle_wng  (Original Message)    Sent: 11/3/2007 1:50 AM
    

Moscow critical of Burns’ comment on Duma election monitoring

02.11.2007, 21.44

MOSCOW, November 2 (Itar-Tass) -- The U.S. claims of the alleged failure of State Duma elections monitoring to comply with the OSCE/ODIHR criteria aim to dispute democracy in Russia and promote U.S. foreign political goals, the Foreign Ministry said on Friday in comments on the recent Vienna statement of Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns.

He claimed that Russia was allegedly trying to impede the activity of international observers at the State Duma elections of December 2.

“The unfounded assertions show that certain forces in the West are allergic to the sovereignty of Russia’s democratic system, which is not following guidelines given from the overseas but abides by internal laws, which correspond to the free choice made by the Russian people in the early 1990s,” the ministry said.

“Russia is strictly complying with international electoral commitments, which were defined in the document of the Copenhagen Conference of the Human Dimension of the CSCE in 1990 and a number of other unanimously adopted OSCE documents. The commitments include the universal and equal election rights, the secret ballot, and regular and competitive elections,” the ministry said.

As for the modality of election monitoring, “it is defined by the ODIHR regulations, which do not enjoy the status of an international treaty and thus is not legally binding for OSCE member states,” the ministry said.

“Hence OSCE member countries have the right to select the number of election observers and the period of their visit,” the ministry said. “OSCE Secretary General Marc Perrin Brichambaut recently told the Russian media that everyone must invite election observers, but it is up to the host country to determine their number.”

“Russia has been advocating the adoption of the fundamental principles of OSCE/ODIHR election monitoring in order to legalize the modality issue,” the ministry said.

“Mr. Burns seems to care for Russian democracy, so why doesn’t the United State support our initiative?” the ministry said. “Alas, in that case they would have to abide by electoral principles, as well.”

”In contrast to Russia, the United States has not brought domestic laws in correspondence with OSCE requirements. The Americans are limiting the number of OSCE observers and offer the ODIHR to reach agreement on election monitoring missions with the authorities of states or even counties. For instance, only 92 OSCE observers were invited to the U.S. presidential and congressional elections in November 2004, and they could monitor the ballot in only the capital city and 12 states. Only 18 international observers were invited to watch the midterm elections in November 2006, and they performed their duty in 14 states,” the ministry said.

“The American lists of voters also have many flaws, as that country does not have the compulsory registration of residence. OSCE observers described provisional ballots as a very inefficient form of the expression of will,” the ministry said. “The content of voting papers was criticized, as well. Many states include municipal candidates in the same voting papers with presidential candidates. Besides, the election and the count of votes are supervised by state secretaries, who are political nominees of governors and form their teams by party principle.”

The American democracy is far from being perfect by OSCE standards, the ministry said.

“The U.S. claims of our incompliance with OSCE/ODIHR monitoring criteria are nothing but an attempt to use the occasion for questioning Russian democracy and pursue its own foreign political goals,” the ministry said.

http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=12032744&PageNum=0

comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1

Post comment

Your name*

Email address*

Url

Comments*

Verification code*







 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search Analysis Opinion



ANALYSIS / OPINION



Archive


 december 2013

 november 2013

 october 2013

 september 2013

 august 2013

 july 2013

 june 2013

 may 2013

 april 2013

 march 2013

 february 2013

 december 2012

 august 2012

 july 2012

 april 2012

 march 2012

 february 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 march 2011

 february 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 may 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2008

 november 2008

 october 2008

 august 2008

 july 2008

 may 2008

 february 2008

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 april 2000

 february 2000



Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®