Hotmail  |  Gmail  |  Yahoo  |  Justice Mail
powered by Google
WWW http://www.JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com

Add JFNC Google Bar Button to your Browser Google Bar Group  
 
 
Welcome To Justice For North Caucasus Group

Log in to your account at Justice For North Caucasus eMail system.

Request your eMail address

eMaill a Friend About This Site.

Google Translation

 

 

CAN INITIAL MOVES TOWARDS ABKHAZ-GEORGIAN RAPPROCHEMENT BE SUSTAINED?

posted by FerrasB on August, 2005 as Abkhazia


From: MSN NicknameEagle_wng  (Original Message)    Sent: 8/16/2005 4:00 AM
CAN INITIAL MOVES TOWARDS ABKHAZ-GEORGIAN RAPPROCHEMENT BE SUSTAINED?
16.08.2005 - 00:32:03

The Tiflis office of the UN Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) is encouraged by the constructive atmosphere at the 4 August UN-mediated talks between Abkhaz and Georgian delegations and at a 10 August meeting in Sukhum...

The Tiflis office of the UN Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) is encouraged by the constructive atmosphere at the 4 August UN-mediated talks between Abkhaz and Georgian delegations and at a 10 August meeting in Sukhum between top Abkhaz leaders and the diplomatic representatives in Tbilisi of the five member states of the Friends of the UN Secretary-General for Georgia group, an UNOMIG spokeswoman told RFE/RL on 11 August.

But the spat earlier this week over plans to resume rail traffic between Russia and Tbilisi via Abkhazia demonstrated once again how both Tbilisi and Sukhum still seek to occupy the moral high ground and depict the other as the primary obstacle to a peaceful and mutually acceptable settlement of the conflict.

Georgian and Abkhaz representatives met in Tbilisi on 4 August under the aegis of Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan´s special representative for Georgia, to discuss security guarantees for the nonresumption of hostilities and confidence-building measures in the Abkhaz conflict zone, which are necessary preconditions for the return to their homes of those among the estimated 200,000-250,000 Georgians who fled Abkhazia during the 1992-1993 war who have not already done so.

As Annan noted in his most recent (13 July 2005) report to the UN Security Council on the situation in Abkhazia, the focus in UN-mediated talks in recent months on repatriation and economic cooperation -- including the planned resumption of rail traffic from Russia to Tbilisi via Abkhazia -- is intended to improve confidence between the two sides so that negotiations on a comprehensive political settlement of the conflict can take place, using the paper entitled Basic Principles for the Distribution of Competences Between Tbilisi and Sukhumi as a starting point.

That draft settlement plan envisages Abkhazia remaining a constituent part of Georgia.

The 4 August meeting was the latest in a series convened on the basis of a declaration signed in Yalta four years in which the Georgian and Abkhaz sides appealed for the support of the international community in addressing two key issues: the nonresumption of armed conflict, and the safe and unconditional return of refugees and displaced persons, in the first phase to Abkhazia´s southernmost Gal Raion (within its old borders).

The Georgian representation to the most recent talks was headed by Minister for Conflict Resolution Giorgi Khaindrava and the Abkhaz one by Foreign Minister Sergei Shamba.

As on several earlier occasions, the two sides reaffirmed their commitment to the nonresumption of hostilities and the unconditional return of refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs), and they discussed a new draft document, authored by Tbilisi-based Abkhaz government-in-exile Chairman Irakli Alasania and augmented by Abkhaz suggestions, aimed at formalizing at a high level their shared commitment to resolving the conflict peacefully and to ensuring the safe and dignified return to their homes in Abkhazia of refugees and IDPs.

That draft document has not been made public, but during an interview with Eurasia View published on 1 July, Alasania shed some light on Georgia´s new approach to resolving the conflict.

He explained that Russia´s clumsy attempt last fall to engineer the outcome of the Abkhaz presidential ballot made it clear to the new leadership headed by President Sergei Bagapsh how dramatic, unstable and insecure Abkhazia´s relations with Russia are.

(That line of argument fails to take into consideration the extent to which Abkhazia is economically dependent on Russia.)

As a result of that Abkhaz shift, Alasania believes, the new leadership in Sukhum is more amenable to considering a new Georgian policy of pro-active engagement, of which Alasania is presumably the architect.

That policy, Alasania said, should be carefully tailored to provide incentives to the Abkhaz side to engage more actively in the peace process.

It will, he continued, address their concerns on a priority basis and, at the same time, be adequately receptive to the legitimate aspirations of Georgian displaced persons to return to their abandoned homes.

(Although Alasania did not say as much, Georgia also now has greater room for maneuver following the death one year ago of Alasania´s hawkish predecessor, Tamaz Nadareishvili, who with the tacit support of Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze lobbied tirelessly for a UN Security Council peace enforcement operation in Abkhazia.)

Alasania further admitted that the previous Georgian policy of seeking to isolate Abkhazia politically and economically has proven a failure, and that Tbilisi is now seriously considering all possible ways to bring the Abkhaz community out of isolation.

As a first step towards doing so, Georgian, Abkhaz, and Russian government experts agreed during talks in Moscow in June and Sukhum last month on measures that, if implemented, will result in the resumption of rail traffic from Russia via the Abkhaz Black Sea littoral to Tbilisi and then Yerevan.

The heads of the Abkhaz and Georgian delegations, Shamba and Khaindrava, both positively evaluated the 4 August Tbilisi talks; Khaindrava even raised the possibility of a meeting between Bagapsh and Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili.

The cautious optimism engendered by the 4 August talks was reinforced on 10 August, when the diplomatic representatives in Tbilisi of the five states that are members of the Friends of the UN Secretary General for Georgia group (France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) met in Sukhum on 10 August with Bagapsh, Abkhaz Prime Minister Aleksandr Ankvab, and Foreign Minister Shamba.

Bagapsh and German Ambassador Uwe Schramm both subsequently described the meeting as constructive, and Bagapsh expressed his appreciation of the work of the UN, specifically of UN Special Representative Tagliavini, to resolve the Abkhaz conflict.

At the same time, Bagapsh stressed that while Abkhazia is ready to discuss any topic conducive to peaceful dialogue, it will not compromise on its self-proclaimed independent status, which remains the main point of dispute between Tbilisi and Sukhum.

In a 5 August interview with regnum.ru, Bagapsh argued that that disagreement should not be an obstacle to economic cooperation, especially as such cooperation benefits Georgia as well as Abkhazia.

He recalled that he has always advocated a competition with Tbilisi to determine which state can develop its economy and crack down on crime faster and with greater success.

Asked what he considers the ideal compromise solution to the conflict, Bagapsh replied the best compromise would be two neighbor states -- Georgia and Abkhazia, and he adduced the example of the Czech Republic and Slovakia as proof that such a solution is feasible.

Bagapsh´s stated commitment to building an independent state is, however, difficult to reconcile with the political settlement based on the Basic Principles that continues to be the UN´s ultimate objective.

Nor is Abkhazia´s ultimate status vis-a-vis the central Georgian government the only issue still to be resolved. Still under discussion are the UN requirement that Georgian children whose families are repatriated to Gali be able to attend Georgian-language schools, and the Abkhaz leadership´s continued reluctance either to condone the deployment in Gali of UN civilian police (to complement the 11 UN civilian police officers currently deployed in Zugdidi Raion in the Georgian section of the conflict zone), or to open a UN office in Gali to address human-rights issues.

Both institutions are badly needed in light of the sporadic reprisals against and abductions of Georgian returnees by Abkhaz criminal formations and what appear to be tit-for-tat attacks by Georgian smugglers on Abkhaz police and customs officials.

Annan´s 13 July report to the Security Council noted 11 armed robberies, one shooting, one abduction, five detentions, and one explosion in Gali over the previous six months, and three weeks ago Abkhaz police detained 18 Georgians in Gali; six of them were subsequently released, but the remaining 12 face criminal charges of illegal logging.

It is possible that less than one year into his presidency Bagapsh does not yet feel secure enough to agree to any concessions that his political opponents might later seek to use against him.

But in a summary of the 10 August talks posted on the UNOMIG website (www.unomig.org), German Ambassador Schramm noted Bagapsh´s pragmatism and direct approach, qualities that raise hopes that he is both committed and flexible enough to continue the search for mutually acceptable agreements with Tbilisi, first on economic issues and then on more sensitive political issues.

That search is likely, however, to be fraught with tension and bedeviled by repeated setbacks, some of them induced by the intransigence of the conflicting sides.

For example, the beginning of a joint Georgian-Abkhaz-Russian operation to assess the extent of the repairs needed to render operational the railway running from Russia via Abkhazia´s Black Sea coast onwards to Tbilisi, initially scheduled for 9 August, was delayed because three Georgian railroad engineers who had fled Abkhazia during the 1992-1993 war were refused entry to Abkhaz-controlled territory.

(Liz Fuller)

Source: RFE/RL Caucasus Report Vol. 8, No. 27, 15 August 2005

080705- Republic of Abkhazia

http://www.kafkas.org.tr/absoluten/showarticle.php?articleID=1289

comments (0)


1 - 1 of 1



 RSS FEED


New Posts



Search ABKHAZIA



Abkhazia



Archive


 january 2014

 november 2013

 december 2012

 september 2012

 august 2012

 may 2012

 march 2012

 january 2012

 july 2011

 june 2011

 may 2011

 april 2011

 january 2011

 december 2010

 november 2010

 october 2010

 september 2010

 august 2010

 july 2010

 june 2010

 april 2010

 march 2010

 february 2010

 january 2010

 december 2009

 november 2009

 october 2009

 september 2009

 august 2009

 july 2009

 june 2009

 may 2009

 april 2009

 march 2009

 february 2009

 january 2009

 december 2007

 november 2007

 october 2007

 september 2007

 august 2007

 july 2007

 june 2007

 may 2007

 april 2007

 march 2007

 february 2007

 january 2007

 december 2006

 november 2006

 october 2006

 september 2006

 august 2006

 july 2006

 june 2006

 may 2006

 april 2006

 march 2006

 february 2006

 january 2006

 december 2005

 november 2005

 october 2005

 september 2005

 august 2005

 july 2005

 june 2005

 may 2005

 april 2005

 march 2000









Acknowledgement: All available information and documents in "Justice For North Caucasus Group" is provided for the "fair use". There should be no intention for ill-usage of any sort of any published item for commercial purposes and in any way or form. JFNC is a nonprofit group and has no intentions for the distribution of information for commercial or advantageous gain. At the same time consideration is ascertained that all different visions, beliefs, presentations and opinions will be presented to visitors and readers of all message boards of this site. Providing, furnishing, posting and publishing the information of all sources is considered a right to freedom of opinion, speech, expression, and information while at the same time does not necessarily reflect, represent, constitute, or comprise the stand or the opinion of this group. If you have any concerns contact us directly at: eagle@JusticeForNorthCaucasus.com


Page Last Updated: {Site best Viewed in MS-IE 1024x768 or Greater}Copyright © 2005-2009 by Justice For North Caucasus ®